10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2025-408-676
Iván Diego Rodríguez
Valnalón. Departamento de Formación
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-8640
Juan Gamboa
Universidad de Deusto
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0775-1312
Antonio Mondaca
Fundación Caixabank
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5876-8950
Mónica Moso
Fundación Caixabank
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0060-1549
Vocational Education and Training (henceforth VET) attracts different profiles of adults who, at different points in their life course, decide to return to education/training (Cournoyer et al., 2017).. In Europe, this trend has been accentuated in recent years and more and more schools are admitting adults to IVET courses (Markowitsch & Hefler, 2019).. The return of adults to the education system is a phenomenon that shows large variations across occupations and countries (Lerman 2017, cited by Markowitsch & Hefler, 2019).
These flows are an example of the increasing de-standardisation, individualisation and fragmentation of young people´s transitions to adulthood (Montes Ruiz, 2019) and challenge the excessively rigid and linear configuration of educational pathways and routes to employment, which have long since become much more ambiguous, protracted and indirect (e.g. Golding, 1999; Moodie, 2004; Taylor & Jain, 2017; Townsend & Dever, 1999)..
The presence of university graduates in VET classrooms is not a new phenomenon, nor is it exclusive to Spain. Research undertaken in countries such as Australia and the United States aimed at determining the volume of this flow, the context in which it occurs and the reasons behind this decision. The counter-intuitive nature of University-to-VET transfer is perhaps one of the reasons why this phenomenon has received little attention in Europe (Montes Ruiz, 2019).
In the United States, Townsend & Dever (1999) coined the concept of "Post Baccalaureate Reverse Transfer" to characterise the movement of university graduates to Community Colleges (2-year VET). Two years earlier, Gose (1997) estimated that between 10% and 20% of students entering this type of training had a previous university degree. Subsequently, several authors (e.g. Friedel & Friesleben, 2017; Leigh, 2009) have continued this line of research but the scope has often been limited to specific educational institutions or states, so that no clear picture is available at the country level.
In Australia, the movement of graduates from university to VET was virtually unknown until Golding (1999) uncovered the magnitude of this flow in the State of Victoria. In the period 1991-1997, he estimated that about 40,000 VET students had a prior university qualification each year, although the accuracy of these figures was questioned years later by Moodie (2004). More recent statistics show that in the last five years the percentage of VET graduates with a prior university degree in Australia is between 12% and 15% (National Centre for Vocational Education Research, 2022)..
Generally speaking, university graduates decide to enrol in a VET
programme years after obtaining their degree. In Europe, tertiary
education attracts a significant number of students aged 25+ as an
Golding (1999) and Townsend and Dever (1999) highlight the unforeseen nature of this movement both for the individuals involved, as it was not part of their career plans, and for the VET providers, designed to take in students entering from conventional entry routes such as Compulsory Secondary Education or Upper Secondary Education. In the USA, Friedel & Friesleben (2017) criticise the fact that educational authorities still do not have the relevant mechanisms in place to collect data on the volume and characteristics of VET students with previous university degrees and to analyse the impact of their presence on the quality of training or at a budgetary level.
Periods of economic downturn and the resulting increase in unemployment and job insecurity lead to a return to the education system of people with work experience (e.g. Harris et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2014; Molgat et al., 2011). For instance, in Australia, the movement of university graduates into VET took place in the early 1990s during an episode of economic recession that led to high unemployment rates among university graduates (Golding, 1999). In any case, several authors point to the multi-causal character of this phenomenon (e.g. Chen et al., 2020; Hagedorn & Castro, 1999; Harris et al., 2006; Quinley & Quinley, 1999).. For example, Harris et al. (2006) identified 19 factors including, among others, improved employment prospects, cost of study, location, school reputation, flexibility of study mode, recommendation from social or work environment, or purely personal interest. These decisions take place in contexts of uncertainty and not always voluntarily (Fouad & Bynner, 2008) and are reactive or proactive depending on a combination of individual, social and contextual factors (Cournoyer et al., 2017)..
In this article two hypotheses are put forward to explain the
movement of Spanish university graduates (ISCED 5) into Higher VET,
the
This hypothesis suggests that University graduates (ISCED 6) enrol in a Higher VET programmes (ISCED 5) that are not related to their previous degree on the lookout for a career change. The reskilling strategy may be motivated by unemployment or job insecurity, but also by personal or family reasons. In Spain, Rujas Martínez-Novillo (2015) points to the Intermediate VET programmes as a re-entry door or a way of "recycling" for people who left the school system without the compulsory education qualification but the aim of this article is to check whether the Higher VET programmes constitute a reskilling route for people with a university degree.
VET has been identified as a way for university graduates to
expand the repertoire of professional skills that they have not
obtained at the end of their academic training (Temmerman, 2019). In
Spain, García-Brosa (2019) points to the Higher VET programmes as an
incipient re-entry route into the education system for university
graduates seeking to specialise in certain areas or to complement
their training.
Thus, the
In general terms, the approach to test these hypotheses is to verify whether or not there is a relationship between prior university education and subsequent VET studies, as will be seen in the following section.
In order to determine the magnitude of the flow of university graduates into Higher VET, it is essential to identify a robust, reliable and accessible data source (Teese & Watson, 2001). In Spain, the latest edition of the Survey on the Transition from Education/Training to Labour Market Insertion (hereafter ETEFIL-19) (INE, 2020) fits the needs of this study to a large extent due to the size of the sample analysed, its accessibility and the type of data collected that allow us to establish the degree of relationship between the chosen VET programme and the previous university degree.
The main objective of ETEFIL-19 is "to
ETEFIL-19 surveyed in 2019 an effective sample of 7,802 Higher VET graduates out of a theoretical sample of 11,031 persons from a total population of 113,910 persons who had successfully completed a Higher VET qualification in the academic year 2013-2014. It should be noted that ETEFIL-19 provides estimates with a relative error of no more than 5% for the most important characteristics, using the Jackknife method (INE, 2020).
In order to achieve the objectives of the present study, a subsample of the total effective sample (n=7,802) was selected, consisting of Higher VET graduates who had a university degree before enrolling in Higher VET programme (through the variable EST_B19_1 of ETEFIL-19). This subset is made up of 767 persons representing 9.8% of the sample.
Once the study sample had been selected, dichotomous variables were created to classify the previous university degree and the Higher VET programme according to whether or not they belonged to the scientific-technological field (STEM/NOT STEM). STEM university degrees were categorised as those included in two branches of knowledge: Engineering and Architecture and Science. In the case of VET, nine programme areas were included in the STEM category according to the classification proposed by the National Institute for Educational Assessment (INEE, 2017)
STEM BRANCHES (university) |
STEM PROGRAMME AREAS (VET) |
---|---|
Science Engineering and Architecture |
Building and Civil Works Electricity and Electronics Energy and Water Mechanical Manufacturing Food Industries Extractive
Industries IT and Communications Installations and Maintenance Chemistry Transport and maintenance of vehicles |
Source: Compiled by the authors
It should be noted that Health-related studies are left out of
this categorisation following the proposal of the US National
Science Foundation (n.d.), considering that a good part of Health
and Health Sciences graduates end up working in the care field and
not so much in sectors linked to research or
innovation
From this categorisation it is determined that there is a
relationship between the VET qualification and the previous
university degree both when both belong to the field of science,
technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM→STEM) or when both
are outside (NON STEM→ NON STEM). Both scenarios support the
Data analysis was carried out with JAMOVI v2.3.21.0, an open
source statistical analysis software. The analyses include the
calculation of descriptive statistics (analysis of the flow of
university students to VET) and descriptive-correlational analyses
to test the
The chi-square test (χ2) of independence allows us to determine whether there is a relationship between the type of Higher VET qualification obtained in 2014 and the previous university degree considering two large categories (STEM and NO STEM). In this case, the sample corresponds to a single population, Higher VET graduates with previous university degree. The individuals have been classified according to two qualitative variables of a binomial nature: STEM Higher VET (Yes/No) and previous STEM university degree (Yes/No).
The number of people with a previous university degree who obtained a Higher VET qualification in the 2013-2014 academic year was 767, which represents 9.8 % of the sample at national level (n=7802). In addition, 17.1% of Higher VET graduates with a university degree (n=131) had at least a Master´s degree.
The average age at the time of obtaining the Higher VET diploma in 2014 was 32 years and 50% were 30 years old or older (min=23, max=45, SD=6.5 years).
N | Percentage | N | Percentage | |
Under 25 | 4.462 | 57,2% | 73 | 9,5% |
25-34 years | 2.428 | 31,1% | 454 | 59,2% |
35-44 years | 648 | 8,3% | 181 | 23,6% |
45 years and over | 264 | 3,4% | 59 | 7,7% |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
The percentage of Higher VET graduates with a previous university degree doubles the average (9,8%) in the 25-34 age group (18.7%) and almost triples among graduates aged 35-44 (27.9%).
N | N | Percentage | |
4.462 | 73 | 1,6% | |
2.428 | 454 | 18,7% | |
648 | 181 | 27,9% | |
264 | 59 | 22,3 % | |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
The results in Tables II and III indicate that the decision to pursue VET studies does not take place immediately after completing university studies. In terms of gender, 67.5% are women, although the gender gap decreases with age, as shown in Table IV.
N | % of row | N | % of row | N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Under 25 | 15 | 20,5% | 58 | 79,5% | 73 |
25-34 years | 140 | 30,8% | 314 | 69,2% | 454 |
35-44 years | 70 | 38,7% | 111 | 61,3% | 181 |
45 and older | 24 | 40,7% | 35 | 59,3% | 59 |
The main reason for university graduates to enrol in Higher
VET programmes is to improve their future career prospects
(67.8%). Personal interest comes next in the list. The expansion
of knowledge for personal satisfaction is a reason cited more
frequently by university graduates (24.8%) than by the sample as
a whole (17.7%). In third place are "other reasons"
(6.9%), which are not further detailed in the ETEFIL-19
micro-data
N | Percentage | N | Percentage | |
5.607 | 71,9% | 520 | 67,8% | |
1.380 | 17,7% | 190 | 24,8% | |
796 | 10,2% | 53 | 6,9% | |
19 | 0,2% | 4 | 0,5% | |
Source: Own elaboration based on ETEFIL-19 data.
With the ETEFIL-19 data is not possible to determine whether University graduates were unemployed when they decided to enrol in Higher VET programme. However, 18.9% of the sample who was employed in 2019 indicated they stayed at the same job they had before earning their Higher VET qualification in 2014. This suggests that, in these cases, unemployment was not the reason to study VET.
In 2019, five years after completing the Higher VET qualification, and regardless of their employment situation, 85% of university graduates indicate that they would enrol in Higher VET again, compared with 85.4% of the total sample. Likewise, 83.1% of university graduates would choose the same Higher VET programme again, which attests to a higher degree of satisfaction with the training studied than the sample as a whole (74.1%).
6.663 | 85,4% | 652 | 85,0% | |
4.936 | 74,1% | 190 | 83,1% |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
At regional level, the percentages of Higher VET graduates with a previous university degree, vary substantially ranging from 4.9% in Catalonia to 13.3% in the Valencian Community which tops the list of eight regions with percentages above the national average of 9.8%. The other regions that exceed the national average are Asturias (12.8%), the Canary Islands (12.7%), Galicia (12.7%), Castile and Leon (11.9%), Andalusia (11.8%), Murcia (10.5%) and Cantabria (10.3%). The autonomous cities of Ceuta (21%) and Melilla (4.6%) mark the maximum and minimum, respectively.
Almost half of the Higher VET graduates with previous university degree (49.9%) come from the "Social and Legal Sciences" branch. They are followed in order of importance by holders of degrees in "Engineering and Architecture" branch (16.8%) and "Sciences" (13.3%), which together represent 30% of university graduates who had completed a STEM degree before enroling in Higher VET. Health Sciences and Arts and Humanities contribute a similar percentage of graduates that is slightly above 9% (Table VII).
Social and legal sciences | 383 | 49,9% |
Engineering and Architecture | 129 | 16,8% |
Science | 102 | 13,3% |
Health sciences | 72 | 9,4% |
Arts and Humanities | 70 | 9,1% |
Indeterminable | 11 | 1,4% |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
A slightly more fine-grained analysis reveals that one out of
every five university graduates who completed a Higher VET
programme had a degree in the field of Education Sciences and
Teacher Training (20.7%), Architecture and
Construction
Although the presence of Higher VET graduates with a previous
university degree has been detected in each and every one of the
25 Higher VET programme areas
Socio-cultural and community services | 130 | 16,9% |
Health | 97 | 12,6% |
Hospitality and tourism | 67 | 8,7% |
IT and communications | 52 | 6,8% |
Administration and management | 43 | 5,6% |
Trade and marketing | 39 | 5,1% |
Image and sound | 38 | 5,0% |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
University graduates are unevenly represented across VET
programme areas ranging from a barely 3.8% of Higher VET
graduates in Physical Activities and Sports programmes to values
over 15% in Food industries (17.1%) and Chemistry
(16.9%)
As mentioned above, testing the
Table IX shows that graduates from STEM branches (Science and Engineering and Architecture) are in the majority in six VET programme areas clearly ascribed to the STEM field (INEE, 2017).
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
Similarly, non-STEM university graduates (Social and Legal Sciences and Arts and Humanities) represent a majority in non-STEM Higher VET Programmes (Table X).
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Socio-cultural and community services | 130 | 122 | 93,8% |
Graphic arts | 14 | 13 | 92,9% |
Trade and marketing | 39 | 36 | 92,3% |
Image and sound | 38 | 34 | 89,5% |
Administration and management | 43 | 35 | 81,4% |
Hospitality and tourism | 67 | 54 | 80,6% |
Physical and sporting activities (including intermediate level sporting education) | 9 | 7 | 77,8% |
Transport and maintenance of vehicles | 7 | 5 | 71,4% |
Personal image | 12 | 8 | 66,7% |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
Tables IX and X show, therefore, that there is a certain
relationship between the branch of university studies of origin
and the area of Higher VET programme completed in 2014 in a high
percentage of cases, supporting the
However, Information Technologies (IT) and Food Industries are two VET programme areas in the STEM field that do not fit this pattern. In the IT area, 55.8% of Higher VET graduates with previous university degree come from Non-STEM disciplines outnumbering STEM university graduates (40.4%) by 15 percentage points. A similar pattern is observed in the Food Industries programme area although the differences are smaller (Table XI).
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
On the other hand, the presence of STEM university graduates in non-STEM VET programme areas is much lower, exceeding 10% only in the following areas: Administration and management (16.3%), Hotel and catering and tourism (12%), Image and Sound (10.5%).
Table XII shows that 65% of STEM university graduates opted for a STEM VET programme. This pattern is even more pronounced among non-STEM university graduates who opted in the majority (79.8%) for professional families outside the scientific-technological field. The contingency analysis, (χ2= 122.7, df=1, p < .001), indicates that there is a positive and significant association between the university branch of origin and the VET programme of destination. The Phi coefficient shows that the magnitude of the relationship between the variables has a moderate to large effect size (0.407).
Observed | 134 | 71 | 205 | ||
Expected | 72,1 | 133 | 205 | ||
% row | 65,4 % | 34,6 % | 100 % | ||
Observed | 83 | 329 | 412 | ||
Expected | 144,9 | 267 | 412 | ||
% row | 20,1 % | 79,9 % | 100 % | ||
Observed | 217 | 400 | 617 | ||
Expected | 217,0 | 400 | 617 | ||
% row | 35,2 % | 64,8 % | 100 % |
122,7 | 1 | < .001 | 0.407 | |
617 |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
Having a Higher VET qualification has proved useful to find a job for 57,4% of Higher VET graduates with a previous university degree employed in 2019. This perception changes depending on the time when they found the job. Among those who kept the same job they had before graduation in Higher VET, only 37.4% considered that the Higher VET qualification had been useful. In contrast, the perception of usefulness rises to 62% among those university graduates who found or changed jobs after completing the Higher VET qualification in 2014.
The correlation analysis (χ2= 24.7, df=1, p < .001), indicates that there is a positive and significant correlation between the time of finding employment and the perceived usefulness of the Higher VET qualification. On the other hand, the Phi coefficient (0.19) shows a moderate effect size. It should be noted that no differences are observed when comparing the perceived usefulness of Higher VET qualification of STEM university graduates (62.5 %) with that of graduates from NON STEM university graduates (62.3 %) employed in their current job from 2014 onwards.
Observed | 46 | 77 | 123 | |
Expected | 70,6 | 52,4 | 123 | |
% of row | 37,4 % | 62,6 % | 100 % | |
Observed | 328 | 201 | 529 | |
Expected | 303,4 | 225,6 | 529 | |
% of row | 62,0 % | 38,0 % | 100 % | |
Observed | 374 | 278 | 652 | |
Expected | 374,0 | 278,0 | 652 | |
% of row | 57,4 % | 42,6 % | 100 % |
24,7 | 1 | < .001 | 0.191 | |
652 |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
Table XIV shows that STEM university graduates who transferred to a Non-STEM Higher VET programme are more sceptical about the usefulness of VET studies for finding employment (66%) than non-STEM university graduates in STEM Higher VET programmes (79.7%). However, these differences are not statistically significant (χ2 = 2.6, df=1, p =.104)
Observed | 35 | 18 | 53 | |
Expected | 38,8 | 14,2 | 53,0 | |
% of row | 66,0 % | 34,0 % | 100 % | |
Observed | 47 | 12 | 59 | |
Expected | 43,2 | 15,8 | 59,0 | |
% of row | 79,7 % | 20,3 % | 100 % | |
Observed | 82 | 30 | 112 | |
Expected | 82,0 | 30,0 | 112,0 | |
% of row | 73,2 % | 26,8 % | 100 % |
2,64 | 1 | 0.104 | |
112 |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on ETEFIL-19 data.
Firstly, and given the scarcity of research in the field of unexpected educational trajectories (Markowitsch & Hefler, 2019; Friedel & Friesleben, 2017; Leigh, 2009)this study shows novel research results in University-to-VET transfer in Spain. The scope and weight of this flow of young people and adults shows that it is a relevant line of research, since one in ten graduates in Higher VET had already completed university studies in the years analysed. This work reveals the existence of a profile of Higher VET students whose specific needs, reasons and causes leading to these somewhat counterintuitive trajectories have not been considered in the design of conventional educational itineraries.
Second, the characterisation of these students shows a clear gender bias, as more than two thirds are female (67.5%). According to Duncan´s dissimilarity ranking (Imdorf et al, 2015), this trajectory is very close to qualify as feminised (within 3 percentage points). The age at which this educational decision is made shows a different dynamic depending on gender, with female university graduates making this transition at an earlier age (under 35) than males, with a higher proportion after the age of 45.
Thirdly, the movement of University graduates into Higher VET is
more oriented towards
In fourth place, the main motivation for pursuing this path is career-related (67.8%), which is largely in line with the final assessment of usefulness, since five years after graduating in Higher VET most of the university students considered that the VET qualification was useful for them to find or change jobs (57%). Although this depends on whether or not they previously had a job, with a more positive influence on those who did not have a job before 2014. Therefore, it can be inferred that this pathway is more useful for labour market insertion than for labour mobility. However, more research is needed in this respect. In any case satisfaction with the decision made is high in general terms as most of university graduates would transfer again to Higher VET (85%) and would choose the same Higher VET programme (83.1%)-
Fifthly, there is a clear need to adopt measures that make the bidirectionality of the VET-University pathways visible through the exchange of information and recognition mechanisms between the two systems, since the pathway from University to VET is not only important, but also represents a useful learning strategy for labour market insertion and improvement. Although, in Spain, the mutual recognition of credits in both directions has been in force since 2011 (RD 1618/2011, of 14 November, on the recognition of studies in the field of Higher Education), the path from university to VET provides new elements to consider in the configuration of the formulas for transfer, connection and new models of relationship between Higher Level VET and the University that are proposed by Organic Law 2/2023, of 22 March, on the University System and Organic Law 3/2022, of 31 March, on the organisation and integration of VET.
Finally, the present study identifies educational-occupational transitions that can facilitate the work of career guidance teams, a key agent for the integration of this type of students in VET classrooms (Fletcher & Tyson, 2021). To this end, it is necessary to have up-to-date sources of information on prior university or VET progression in both enrolment processes and graduate tracking protocols and to facilitate cross-referencing between the two systems (Fowler, 2017)..
One limitation of the study is that survey participants completed the Higher VET diploma in 2014, which indicates that they were holders of Bachelor´s and Master´s degrees not adjusted to the model of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) that came into force in 2010. The Royal Decree 1393/2007 of 29 October 2007, establishing the organisation of official university education, predicted that the new organisation of Higher Education studies would increase the employability of graduates. If this prediction is fulfilled, it is possible that the movement of university graduates to Higher VET will decrease. This can only be corroborated when the results of a new edition of ETEFIL become available.
On the other hand, the categorisation of branches of study and VET programme areas as STEM/NON STEM is only a "proxy" to determine the relationship between qualifications at the origin and at destination. A higher level of disaggregation of the data would allow for a more precise analysis of this relationship between specific previous university degrees and VET programmes. Even so, it would still be difficult to establish the relationship between the two if this work is not accompanied by qualitative studies (e.g. interviews, discussion groups, etc.) that allow us to explore in more detail the reasons given by the people who make these non-traditional transitions.
In general, the transition from university to VET is useful for
finding employment but in order to assess more accurately the
success of these
Finally, university graduates make up only a part of the total volume of people moving from the university system to the VET system. Unfortunately, the ETEFIL-19 dataset does not quantify the volume of Higher VET graduates who previously dropped out from university. The drop-out rate for undergraduate studies in Spain stands at 13.5% (Fernández-Mellizo, 2022)but the destination of this group of students once they leave the university system is unknown. Recently, Tieben (2023) has found that VET absorbs a significant proportion of students leaving the German university system with 34.2% of university dropouts choosing VET only one year after leaving. Corroborating in the future whether this phenomenon is repeated in Spain would pave the way for the formulation of specific mechanisms for early drop-out detection and guidance in a coordinated manner between the university system and the VET system.
Aittola, H., & Ursin, J. (2019). Finnish adult students’
perspectives on short-cycle study programmes: Motives and
evaluations.
Billett, S. (2014). The standing of vocational education: Sources
of its societal esteem and implications for its enactment.
Chen, J. C. (2017). Nontraditional Adult Learners: The Neglected
Diversity in Postsecondary Education.
Chen, Y. “April”, Li, R., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2020).
International Reverse Transfer Students: A Critical Analysis Based
on Field, Habitus, and Social and Cultural Capital.
Cournoyer, L., Fournier, G., & Masdonati, J. (2017). Going
Back-to-School in Vocational Education and Training: Introduction.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social
Affairs and Inclusion, Auzinger, M., Ulicna, D., Messerer, K.
(2016).
Evans, R. (2022).
Fernández-Mellizo, M. (2022).
Fletcher, E. C., & Tyson, W. (2021). Examining enrolment
decisions and life challenges of adult learners in advanced
technologies programs.
Fouad, N. A., & Bynner, J. (2008). Work transitions.
Fowler, C. (2017).
Friedel, J. N., & Friesleben, K. L. (2017). Postbaccalaureate
Reverse Transfer Students in Iowa: An Expanded Look at Community
College Students with Previous Degrees Earned.
García-Brosa, G. (2019).
Golding, B. (1999). When the backwash dwarfs the wave: A case
study of the relationship between research, policy and practice
concerning two-way inter-sectoral movement in Australia. En C.
Selby-Smith (Ed.),
Hagedorn, L. S., & Castro, C. R. (1999). Paradoxes:
California’s Experience with Reverse Transfer Students.
Harris, R., Rainey, L., & Sumner, R. (2006).
Hippach-Schneider, U., Schneider, V., Ménard, B., &
Tritscher-Archan, S. (2017). The underestimated relevance and value
of vocational education in tertiary education – making the invisible
visible.
Imdorf, C., Hegna, K., Eberhard, V. y Doray, P. (2015), Educational Systems and Gender Segregation in Education: A Three-Country Comparison of Germany, Norway and Canada. In Gender Segregation in Vocational Education (pp. 83–122). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
INE. (2020).
INEE. (2017).
Lehmann, W., Taylor, A., & Wright, L. (2014). Youth
apprenticeships in Canada: On their inferior status despite skilled
labour shortages.
Leigh, R. A. (2009). Post-Baccalaureate Reverse Transfer Students in Iowa: 2006 to 2008. ERIC Online Submission (ED515621). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED515621.pdf
Ley Orgánica 3/2022, de 31 de marzo, de ordenación e integración
de la Formación Profesional.
Ley Orgánica 2/2023, de 22 de marzo, del Sistema Universitario.
Markowitsch, J., & Hefler, G. (2019).
Molgat, M., Deschenaux, F., & LeBlanc, P. (2011). Vocational education in Canada: Do policy directions and youth trajectories always meet? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(4), 505-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2011.580361
Montes Ruiz, A. (2019).
Moodie, G. (2004). Reverse transfer in Australia.
Moso-Díez, M., Mondaca, A., Gamboa, J., García, I. y Albizu, M.
(2024). Las mujeres en la FP STEM española,
National Centre for Vocational Education Research. (2022, octubre
12).
National Science Foundation. (s. f.).
Quinley, J. W., & Quinley, M. P. (1999). The Urban
Postbaccalaureate Reverse Transfer Student: Giving New Meaning to
the Term Second Chance.
Real Decreto 1393/2007, de 29 de octubre, por el que se establece
la ordenación de las enseñanzas universitarias oficiales.
Real Decreto 1618/2011, de 14 de noviembre, sobre reconocimiento
de estudios en el ámbito de la Educación Superior.
Rujas Martínez-Novillo, J. (2015). La Educación Secundaria para
Adultos y la FP de Grado Medio: ¿Una segunda oportunidad en tiempos
de crisis?
Teese, R., & Watson, L. (2001).
Temmerman, N. (2019, 8 de marzo).
Tieben, N. (2023). Dropping Out of Higher Education in Germany:
Using Retrospective Life Course Data to Determine Dropout Rates and
Destinations of Non-completers. En S. Weinert, G. J. Blossfeld,
& H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.),
Townsend, B. K., & Dever, J. T. (1999). What Do We Know About
Reverse Transfer Students?