Acceso abierto Acceso abierto  Acceso restringido Suscripción o acceso de pago

Dimensions: re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information

Enrique Orduña-Malea, Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar

Resumen


 

The overarching aim of this work is to provide a detailed description of the free version of Dimensions (new bibliographic database produced by Digital Science and launched in January 2018). To do this, the work is divided into two differentiated blocks. First, its characteristics, operation, and features are described, focusing on its main strengths and weaknesses. Secondly, an analysis of its coverage is carried out (comparing it against Web of Science Core CollectionScopus and Google Scholar) in order to determine whether the bibliometric indicators offered by Dimensions have an order of magnitude significant enough to be used. To this end, an analysis is carried out at three levels: journals (sample of 20 publications in ‘Library & Information Science’), documents (276 articles published by the Journal of informetrics between 2013 and 2015), and authors (28 people awarded with the Derek de Solla Price prize). Preliminary results indicate that Dimensions has coverage of the recent literature superior to Scopus, although inferior to Google Scholar. With regard to the number of citations received, Dimensions offers slightly lower figures than Scopus. Despite this, the number of citations in Dimensions exhibits a strong correlation with Scopus and somewhat less (although still significant) with Google Scholar. For this reason, it is concluded that Dimensions is an alternative for carrying out citation studies, able to rival Scopus (greater coverage and free of charge) and Google Scholar (greater functionalities for the treatment and data export).


Palabras clave


Dimensions; Bibliographic databases; Bibliometric portals; Bibliometrics; Online academic profiles; Research evaluation; Discovery tools.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Costas, Rodrigo; Zahedi, Zohreh; Wouters, Paul (2015). “Do ‘altmetrics’ correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309

Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Ayllón, Juan M. (2017). “Google Scholar: the big data bibliographic tool”. En: Cantú-Ortiz, Félix (ed.). Research analytics: boosting university productivity and competitiveness through scientometrics. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), pp. 59-80. ISBN: 978 1 498785426

Martín-Martín, Alberto; Ayllón, Juan M.; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Orduña-Malea, Enrique (2015). “Nature’s Top 100 re-revisited”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 12, pp. 2714-2714. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23570

Martín-Martín, Alberto; Orduna-Malea, Enrique; Ayllón, Juan M.; Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio (2016). “A two-sided academic landscape: snapshot of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar (1950-2013)”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 39, n. 4, e149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.4.1405

McShea, Jo (2018). “Dimensions – a game-changing product launch from Digital”. Outsell. https://figshare.com/s/68dcc69f3fe6189098bb

Mori, Andres; Taylor, Mike (2018). Dimensions metrics API reference & getting started. Digital Science & Research solutions. https://figshare.com/s/3c8f0284e8e51718c1b2

Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Ayllón, Juan M.; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2015). “Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar”. Scientometrics, v. 104, n. 3, pp. 931-949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1614-6

Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Ayllón, Juan M.; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2016). La revolución Google Scholar: destapando la tapa de Pandora académica. Granada: UNE. ISBN: 978 84 33859419

Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2018). “Viva la competencia! Nuevas dimensiones para la búsqueda y evaluación de la información científica”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 12 (in press). https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ThinkEPI/index

Schonfeld, Roger C. (2018). “A new citation database launches today: Digital Science’s Dimensions”. The scholarly kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/01/15/new-citation-database-dimensions

Thelwall, Mike (2018). “Dimensions: a competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?”. Journal of informetrics, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006

Thelwall, Mike; Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2013). “Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services”. PloS one, v. 8, n. 5, e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.00648




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.21

Copyright (c) 2018 El Profesional de la Información