Why are new journals created? An international analysis of Information and Documentation titles (2013-2018)

Resumen

The creation or title changes of scientific journals in the information and documentation (ID) area in the period 2013-2018 are analyzed. Based on the total of 62 such journals identified through ISSN Portal and Ulrichsweb, the following are described: characteristic aspects such as country, language, type of publisher, and access model; presence in bibliographic databases, citations, or journal directories; survival and volume of articles published; annual number of citations to articles according to Google Scholar; thematic scope declared by the editors; and finally, the justification given by the editors for the change of title or the creation of a new journal. Among the main conclusions regarding newly created titles, the leading role of academic publishers in expanding national university systems and open-access titles stands out. In general, new publications generate few articles per year, have little presence in databases, and receive few citations. Title changes were found only in journals published by commercial publishers. In both cases, journals with a general thematic scope predominate and a significant number of journals did not justify their creation or change of title.

Citas

Aharony, Noa (2012). “Library and information science research areas: a content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007-8”. Journal of librarianship and information science, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611424819

Aparicio, Alicia; Banzato, Guillermo; Liberatore, Gustavo (2016). Manual de gestión editorial de revistas científicas de ciencias sociales y humanas: buenas prácticas y criterios de calidad. Buenos Aires: Clacso. ISBN: 978 987 722 213 5

Arasa, Daniel (2016). “Why a new journal?”. Church, communication and culture, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2016.1179423

Bailey, Janet D. (1989). “New journal decision making”. College & research libraries, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 354-359. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_50_03_354

Baue, Arthur E. (2002). “New journals, new societies, more meetings - Do we need them all?”. Archives of surgery, v. 137, n. 12, pp. 1413-1416. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1413

Berger, Monica; Cirasella, Jill (2015). “Beyond Beall’s List”. College & research libraries news, v. 76, n. 3, pp. 132-135. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.76.3.9277

Bernal, John-Desmond (1939). The social function of science. London: George Routledge & Sons. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.218588

Binfield, Peter (2014). “Novel scholarly journal concepts”. In: Bartling, S.; Friesike, S. (eds.) Opening science. Springer, Cham, pp. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_10

Binfield, Peter; Rolnik, Zachary; Brown, Cindy; Cole, Kerry (2008). “Academic journal publishing”. Serials librarian, v. 54, n. 1-2, pp. 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801973992

Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (2015). “Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality”. Scientometrics, v. 103, n. 2, pp. 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1556-z

Chang, Yu-Wei (2018). “Examining interdisciplinarity of library and information science (LIS) based on LIS articles contributed by non-LIS authors”. Scientometrics, v. 116, n. 3, pp. 1589-1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2822-7

Chavarro, Diego; Tang, Puay; Ràfols, Ismael (2017). “Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling”. Research policy, v. 46, n. 9, pp. 1666-1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.002

Chen, Chuanfu; Li, Qiao; Deng, Zhiqing; Chiu, Kuei; Wang, Ping (2018). “The preferences of Chinese LIS journal articles in citing works outside the discipline”. Journal of documentation, v. 74, n. 1, pp. 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2017-0057

Chu, Heting (2006). “Curricula of LIS programs in the USA: A content analysis”. In: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific conference on library & information education & practice 2006, pp. 328-337. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/105144

Cope, Bill; Kalantzis, Mary (2014). “Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal”. In: The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 9-83. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780634647.9

COPE Council (2019). COPE discussion document: predatory publishing, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.6

COPE Council (2020). “Committee on Publication Ethics guidelines”. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Guidelines

Coulter, Gerry (2010). “Launching (and sustaining) a scholarly journal on the Internet: the International Journal of Baudrillard studies”. The journal of electronic publishing, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0013.104

Cox, Brian (2002). “The Pergamon phenomenon 1951-1991: Robert Maxwell and scientific publishing”. Learned publishing, v. 15, n. 4, pp. 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315102760319233

Crow, Raym; Gallagher, Richard; Naim, Kamran (2019). “Subscribe to open: a practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access”. Learned publishing, September, pp. 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1262

Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2001). “Las revistas españolas de ciencias de la documentación: productos manifiestamente mejorables”. El profesional de la información, v. 10, n. 12, pp. 46-56. http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2001/diciembre/10.pdf

DORA (2012). “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)”. https://sfdora.org/read

Egghe, Leo (2007). “Welcome to the Journal of informetrics”. Journal of informetrics, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.09.003

Esposito, Joseph (2014). “The size of the open access market”. The scholarly kitchen, Oct. 29. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/10/29/the-size-of-the-open-access-market

Gu, Xin; Blackmore, Karen L. (2016). “Recent trends in academic journal growth”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 2, pp. 693-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1985-3

Guallar, Javier; Ferran-Ferrer, Núria; Abadal, Ernest; Server, Adán (2017). “Revistas científicas españolas de información y documentación: análisis temático y metodológico”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 5, p. 947. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.16

Guédon, Jean-Claude (2014). “Sustaining the ‘Great conversation’: the future of scholarly and scientific journals”. In: The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780634647.85

Guédon, Jean-Claude (dir.) (2019). Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication: report of the expert group to the European Commission. European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN: 978 9279972386 https://doi.org/10.2777/836532

Hartley, John; Potts, Jason; Montgomery, Lucy; Rennie, Ellie; Neylon, Cameron (2019). “Do we need to move from communication technology to user community? A new economic model of the journal as a club”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 1, pp. 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1228

Haynes, John (1999). “New journal of physics: a web-based and author-funded journal”. Learned publishing, v. 12, n. 4, pp. 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1087/09531519950145661

Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Ràfols, Ismael (2015). “Bibliometrics: The Leiden manifesto for research metrics”. Nature, v. 520, n. 7548, pp. 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

I4OC. “Initiative for Open Citations”. https://i4oc.org/

ISO 8 (2019). ISO 8:2019 (E). Information and documentation — Presentation and identification of periodicals, Geneva: ISO. ISBN: 2831886376

Johnson, Melissa E.; Putnam-Davis, Jennifer; Bandy, Sandra (2019). “Bridging the gap: sustaining publication of a newly created undergraduate research journal”. The serials librarian, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2020.1696622

Johnson, Rob; Mabe, Anthony; Mabe, Michael (2018). The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing: 1968-2018, celebrating the 50th anniversary of STM. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf

Kim, Lanu; Portenoy, Jason H.; West, Jevin D.; Stovel, Katherine W. (2019). “Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, September, asi.24326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24326

Kratochvíl, Jiří; Plch, Lukáš; Sebera, Martin; Koriťáková, Eva (2020). “Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view”. Learned publishing, v. 2008, March, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1299

Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie; Mongeon, Philippe (2015). “The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era”. PloS one, v. 10, n. 6, e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lichstein, Kenneth L. (2003). “Is there a need for another sleep journal?”. Journal of psychosomatic research, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00541-X

Lin, Songqing (2013). “How the approval system affects Chinese scientific journals”. Learned publishing, v. 26, n. 4, pp. 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1087/201304010

Lyons, Scott (2011). “Case study on the development of the International journal of exercise science”. Berkeley Electronic Press Case Studies Collection. http://works.bepress.com/scott_lyons/5

Mabe, Michael; Amin, Mayur (2001). “Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals”. Scientometrics, v. 51, n. 1, pp. 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010520913124

Martín-Martín, Alberto; Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Thelwall, Mike; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2018). “Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories”. Journal of informetrics, v. 12, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

Marušić, Matko; Marušić, Ana; King, Ruth (2013). “Establishing a new journal”. In: Science editors’ handbook. Redruth: European Association of Science Editors, pp. 1-4. ISBN: 978 0 905988115

Meneghini, Rogerio (2012). “Emerging journals: the benefits of and challenges for publishing scientific journals in and by emerging countries”. EMBO reports, v. 13, n. 2, pp. 106-108. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.252

Neuendorf, Kimberly A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks (Calif.): Sage Publications. ISBN: 0761919783 https://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/SkalskiVitae/SkalskiNeuendorfCajigas17.pdf

Ollé-Castellà, Candela; López-Borrull, Alexandre; Abadal, Ernest (2016). “The challenges facing library and information science journals: editors’ opinions”. Learned publishing, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1016

Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Orr, Richard (2019). “The future of OA: a large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership [preprint]”. bioRxiv, 795310. https://doi.org/10.1101/795310

Price, Derek J. de Solla (1961). Science since Babylon, New Haven: Yale University Press, ISBN: 978 0 300017984

Regier, Willis-Goth (2005). “Starting and killing -or reviving- journals”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1353/scp.2005.0030

Repiso, Rafael; Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Aguaded, Ignacio (2019). “Revistas científicas editadas por universidades en Web of Science: características y contribución a la marca universidad”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 4, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.05

Rosen, Bruce; Israeli, Avi (2012). “Launching the Israel journal of health policy research: Why a new journal? Why now? Why open access?”. Israel journal of health policy research, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-1-1

Rowland, J.F.B. (1981). “Why are new journals founded?”. Journal of documentation, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026705

Suber, Peter (2009). “Knowledge as a public good”. Sparc open access newsletter, November 2th. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4391171

Singh-Chawla, Dalmeet (2019). “Open-access row prompts editorial board of Elsevier journal to resign”. Nature. News, January, 14th. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00135-8

Smart, Pipa (2018). Handbook for journal editors. Oxford: Inasp. https://www.inasp.info/editorshandbook

Solomon, David J.; Björk, Bo-Christer (2012). “A study of open access journals using article processing charges”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 8, pp. 1485-1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673

Stranack, Kevin (2008). Starting a new scholary journal in Africa. Vancouver: Public Knowledge Project (PKP). https://pkp.sfu.ca/files/AfricaNewJournal.pdf

Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2019). “The International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics ends support for Journal of Informetrics, launches new open-access journal Quantitative Science Studies”. ISSI blog. http://issi-society.org/blog/posts/2019/january/the-international-society-for-scientometrics-and-informetrics-ends-support-for-journal-of-informetrics-launches-new-open-access-journal-quantitative-science-studies

Tuomaala, Otto; Järvelin, Kalervo; Vakkari, Pertti (2014). “Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005: Content analysis of journal articles”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 7, pp. 1446-1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23034

Urbano, Cristóbal; Ardanuy, Jordi (2020). “Cross-disciplinary collaboration versus coexistence in LIS serials: analysis of authorship affiliations in four European countries”. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03471-z

Van-Raan, Anthony (2019). “Measuring science: basic principles and application of advanced bibliometrics”. In: Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Cham: Springer, pp. 237-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_10

Velterop, Jan (2018). “Plan S and article processing charges (APCs)”. SciELO in perspective, Nov. 27, pp. 1-5. https://blog.scielo.org/en/2018/11/27/plan-s-and-article-processing-charges-apcs

Whitley, Richard (1982). “The establishment and structure of the sciences as reputational organizations”. In: Scientific establishments and hierarchies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 313-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7729-7_12

Willinsky, John; Moorhead, Laura (2014). “How the rise of open access is altering journal publishing”. In: The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780634647.195

Ziman, John-Michael (1980). “The proliferation of scientific literature: a natural process”. Science, v. 208, n. 4442, pp. 369-371. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7367863

Zins, Chaim (2007). “Conceptions of information science”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 3, pp. 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20507

Publicado
2020-05-22
Sección
Artículos de investigación / Research articles