The commoditization of the publication culture in Spain: a cost- and time-effective model to systematize Communication Sciences

Resumen

This paper explores the current paradigm of the publication culture in Spain, examining the negative and positive forces that shape the dominant dynamics in the production, dissemination and evaluation of scholars’ works. Following the intentional sampling of maximum variety, we planned a set of interviews with scholars in the area of ​​communication that represented the heterogeneity of academic ranks, gender, and territories of Spain. The final output consisted of thirty-five semi-structured interviews that took place between May 2018 and May 2019. Scholarship on how researchers and university professors experience publication cultures is abundant, however the national and international studies that address this phenomenon from a holistic approach are practically non-existent. Comprising three actions or systems -production, dissemination and evaluation-, the current publishing culture is depicted as a structure tuned to a set of global-accepted requirements that seem easy to understand and replicate. Under such model, most of the scholars experience discomfort because overproduction is widespread, social transference is rare, and the production and diffusion of scientific works frequently occur at the expense of scholars themselves. The goal seems to be inspired by the cost- and time-effective system of evaluation processes that, despite academics’ general opposition, official bodies and university departments have adopted to circumvent the costly task of assessing scientists’ outcomes on an individual basis.

Citas

Adler, Nancy J.; Harzing, Anne-Wil (2009). “When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings”. Academy of management learning and education, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 72-95. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amle.2009.37012181

Alberts, Bruce (2013). “Impact factor distortions”. Science, v. 340, n. 6134, p. 787. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240319

Alvesson, Mats (2012). “Do we have something to say? From re-search to roi-search and back again”. Organization, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 79-90. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350508412460996

Alvesson, Mats; Gabriel, Yiannis (2013). “Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications”. Academy of management learning and education, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 245-263. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amle.2012.0327

Alvesson, Mats; Gabriel, Yiannis; Paulsen, Roland (2017). Return to meaning: A social science with something to say. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 198787099

Aneca (2017). Publicación de los criterios de evaluación del programa Academia. https://bit.ly/2K7sViz

Anderson, Melissa S.; Ronning, Emily A.; De-Vries, Raymond; Martinson, Brian C. (2007). “The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships”. Science and engineering ethics, n. 13, pp. 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5

Bauerlein, Mark; Gad-el-Hak, Mohamed; Grody, Wayne; McKelvey, Bill; Trimble, Stanley W. (2010). “We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research”. The chronicle of higher education, June 13. https://bit.ly/2Y6NOnZ

Bohm, David; Peat, David (1998). Ciencia, orden y creatividad. Las raíces creativas de la ciencia y la vida. Barcelona: Kairós. ISBN: 978 84 72451841

Bolkan, San; Griffin, Darrin-John; Holmgren, Jennifer-Linn; Hickson III, Mark (2012). “Prolific scholarship in communication studies: Five years in review”. Communication education, v. 61, n. 4, pp. 380-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.699080

Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin (2018). “Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data”. PloS one, v. 13, n. 5, e0197133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197133

Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative research in psychology, v. 3, n. 2, pp. 77-101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bunz, Ulla (2005). “Publish or perish: A limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals”. Journal of communication, v. 55, n. 4, pp. 703-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03018.x

Butler, Nick; Delaney, Helen; Spoelstra, Sverre (2017). “The gray zone: Questionable research practices in the business school”. Academy of management learning and education, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 94-109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0201

Cerulo, Karen A. (2016). “Why do we publish?”. The American sociologist, v. 47, n. 2-3, pp. 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9287-4

Chakravartty, Paula; Kuo, Rachel; Grubbs, Victoria; McIlwain, Charlton (2018). “#Communication so white”. Journal of communication, v. 68, n. 2, pp. 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003

Davies, Benjamin; Felappi, Giulia (2017). “Publish or perish”. Metaphilosophy, v. 48, n. 5, pp. 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12269

De-Rond, Mark; Miller, Alan N. (2005). “Publish or perish: bane or boon of academic life?”. Journal of management inquiry, v. 14, n. 4, pp. 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850

Donsbach, Wolfgang (2006). “The identity of communication research”. Journal of communication, v. 56, n. 3, pp. 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.x

Doyle, Joanne; Cuthill, Michael (2015). “Does ‘get visible or vanish’ herald the end of ‘publish or perish’?”. Higher education research and development, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 671-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1025467

Dresing, Thorsten; Pehl, Thorsten; Schmieder, Christian (2015). Manual (on) transcription: Transcription conventions, software guides and practical hints for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). https://bit.ly/1J6c7k5

Escribà, Eudald; Cortiñas, Sergi (2013). “Internationalization and coauthorship in major communication journals in Spain”. Comunicar, v. 21, n. 41, pp. 35-44. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-03

Fanelli, Danielle (2010). “Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data”. PloS one, v. 5, n. 4, e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271

Feeley, Thomas H. (2008). “A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005”. Human communication research, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 505-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00330.x

Ferlazzo, Fabio; Sdoia, Stefano (2012). “Measuring nepotism through shared last names: Are we really moving from opinions to facts?”. PLoS one, v. 7, n. 8, e43574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043574

Fernández-Quijada, David; Masip, Pere (2013). “Three decades of Spanish communication research: Towards legal age”. Comunicar, v. 21, n. 41, pp. 15-24. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-01

Fernández-Quijada, David; Masip, Pere; Bergillos, Ignacio (2013). “El precio de la internacionalidad: la dualidad en los patrones de publicación de los investigadores españoles en comunicación”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 36, n. 2, e10. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.2.936

Gad-el-Hak, Mohamed (2004). “Publish or perish - An ailing enterprise?”. Physics today, v. 57, n. 3, pp. 61-64. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712503

Gobo, Giampietro (2011). “Glocalizing methodology? The encounter between local methodologies”. International journal of social research methodology, v. 14, n. 6, pp. 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.611379

Goyanes, Manuel (2017). Desafío a la investigación estándar en comunicación: Crítica y alternativas. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. Colección EPI Scholar. ISBN: 978 84 91166757

Goyanes, Manuel; Rodríguez-Gómez, Eduardo-Francisco (2018). “¿Por qué publicamos? Prevalencia, motivaciones y consecuencias de publicar o perecer”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 548-558. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.may.08

Goyanes, Manuel; Rodríguez-Gómez, Eduardo-Francisco; Rosique-Cedillo, Gloria (2018). “Investigación en comunicación en revistas científicas en España (2005-2015): de disquisiciones teóricas a investigación basada en evidencias”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 6, pp. 1281-1291. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.11

Griffin, Darrin J.; Bolkan, San; Holmgren, Jennifer L.; Tutzauer, Frank (2016). “Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 1, pp. 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1774-4

Gunaratne, Shelton A. (2010). “De-Westernizing communication/social science research: Opportunities and limitations”. Media, culture and society, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709361159

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene; Leavy, Patricia L. (2006). The practice of qualitative research. London: Sage, 403 Seiten.

Hilmer, Michael J.; Hilmer, Christiana E. (2009). “Fishes, ponds, and productivity: student‐advisor matching and early career publishing success for economics PhDs”. Economic inquiry, v. 47, n. 2, pp. 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00108.x

Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Chang, Han-Wen; Chen, Dar-Zen (2006). “Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003”. Scientometrics, v. 67, n. 3, pp. 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.6

INE (2019). Encuesta población activa: resultados anuales. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176918&menu=resultados&idp=1254735976595

Johnson, John M.; Rowlands, Timothy (2012). “The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth interviewing”. In: Gubrium, Jaber F.; Holstein, James A.; Marvasti, Amir B.; McKinney, Karyn D. (eds.). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 99-113. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403.n7

Kampourakis, Kostas (2016). “Publish or perish?”. Science and education, v. 25, n. 3-4, pp. 249-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9828-4

Lee, Icy (2014). “Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing”. Language teaching, v. 47, n. 2, pp. 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000504

Levine, Timothy R. (2010). “Rankings and trends in citation patterns of communication journals”. Communication education, v. 59, n. 1, pp. 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903296825

Martínez-Nicolás, Manuel; Saperas-Lapiedra, Enric (2011). “La investigación sobre Comunicación en España (1998-2007). Análisis de los artículos publicados en revistas científicas”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 66, pp. 101-129. http://www.revistalatinacs.org/11/art/926_Vicalvaro/05_Nicolas.html

Martínez-Nicolás, Manuel; Saperas-Lapiedra, Enric (2016). “Objetos de estudio y orientación metodológica de la reciente investigación sobre comunicación en España (2008-2014): Análisis de los trabajos publicados en revistas científicas españolas”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 71, pp. 1365-1384. http://www.revistalatinacs.org/071/paper/1150/70es.html

Matthes, Jörg; Marquart, Franziska; Naderer, Brigitte; Arendt, Florian; Schmuck, Desirée; Adam, Karoline (2015). “Questionable research practices in experimental communication research: A systematic analysis from 1980 to 2013”. Communication methods and measures, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte (2018). Datos y cifras del Sistema universitario español. https://bit.ly/2DiNsy1

McGrail, Matthew R.; Rickard, Claire M.; Jones, Rebecca (2006). “Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates”. Higher education research and development, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053

Miller, Allan N.; Taylor, Shannon G.; Bedeian, Arthur G. (2011). “Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it”. Career development international, v. 16, n. 5, pp. 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751

Musambira, George; Collins, Steven; Brown, Tim; Voss, Kimberly (2012). “From publish or perish to grant or perish: Examining grantsmanship in communication and the pressures on communication faculty to procure external funding for research”. Journalism & mass communication educator, v. 67, n. 3, pp. 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695812454109

Neill, Ushma S. (2008). “Publish or perish, but at what cost?”. The journal of clinical investigation, v. 118, n. 7, pp. 2368. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36371

Nightingale, Julie M.; Marshall, Gill (2012). “Citation analysis as a measure of article quality, journal influence and individual researcher performance”. Radiography, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.044

Patton, Michael-Quinn (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage publications. ISBN: 978 0 761919711

Perceval, José-María; Fornieles-Alcaraz, Javier (2008). “Confucio contra Sócrates: la perversa relación entre la investigación y la acreditación”. Anàlisi, n. 36, pp. 213-224. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Analisi/article/view/94533

Plümper Thomas; Radaelli, Claudio (2004). “Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990-2002”. Journal of European public policy, v. 11, n. 6, pp. 1112-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000298138

Rodríguez-Gómez, Eduardo-Francisco; Goyanes, Manuel; Rosique-Cedillo, Gloria (2018). “Communication research in Spain: labor temporality, intensive production and competitiveness”. Communication & society, v. 31, n. 4, pp. 229-242. http://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/55751

Rodríguez-Martínez, Carmen (2014). “La proletarización del profesorado en la Lomce y en las nuevas políticas educativas: de actores a culpables”. Revista interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, n. 81, pp. 73-87. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5009072

Saperas-Lapiedra, Enric; Carrasco-Campos, Ángel (2017) “¿Cómo investigamos la comunicación en España? La producción científica en revistas especializadas (1990-2014). Métodos y técnicas de investigación”. In: IV Congreso Nacional de Metodología de la Investigación en Comunicación, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.

Sword, Hellen (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 674064485

Thomas, Leon G. (1996). “The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift”. Organization science, v. 7, n. 3, pp. 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.3.221

Tijdink, Joeri K.; Schipper, Katherine; Bouter, Lex M.; Pont, P. Maclaine; De-Jonge, Jos; Smulders, Yvo M. (2016). “How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers”. BMJ open, v. 6, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681

Van-Dalen, Hendrik P.; Henkens, Kène (2012). “Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 7, pp. 1282-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636

Vermeulen, Ivar; Hartmann, Tilo (2015). “Questionable research and publication practices in communication science”. Communication methods and measures, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 189-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331

Volkwein, J. Fredericks; Sweitzer, Kyle V. (2006). “Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges”. Research in higher education, v. 47, n. 2, pp. 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8883-5

Waisbord, Silvio; Mellado, Claudia (2014). “De-Westernizing communication studies: A reassessment”. Communication theory, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12044

Willmott, Hugh (1995). “Managing the academics: Commoditization and control in the development of university education in the U.K.”. Human relations, v. 48, n. 9, pp. 993-1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800902

Willmott, Hugh (2011). “Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: reactivity and the ABS list”. Organization, v. 18, n. 4, pp. 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411403532

Publicado
2020-07-30
Sección
Artículos de investigación / Research articles