Beckett, Censorship and the Problem of Parody

Autores/as

  • Seán Kennedy Saint Mary's University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2019-9186

Palabras clave:

Beckett, biopolítica, Irlanda, censura, parodia

Resumen

In a forceful critique of previous scholarship, Lloyd (Meadhbh) Houston discerns evidence of “sectarian eugenicism” in Beckett’s writings. It is a startling claim, and there are problems to it. In particular, I suggest, Houston ignores the issue of tone: Beckett’s use of parody. Responding to Houston’s critique, I offer some thoughts on eugenicism, sectarianism and misogyny in Murphy and First Love. The aim is not to exculpate Beckett from all charges of prejudice, only to complicate issues of complicity in a theocratic hetero-patriarchal society.

Biografía del autor/a

Seán Kennedy, Saint Mary's University

Seán Kennedy is Professor of English at Saint Mary’s University, Halifax. He is currently editing two volumes, Irish Shame, with Joseph Valente and Sara Martín-Ruiz, and Beckett Beyond The Normal (Edinburgh University Press). He is also completing a monograph, Recovering from Catholicism.

Citas

Barth, Fredrik. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. London: Waveland Press, 1998.

Beckett, Samuel. Murphy. London: Calder, 1993 (1938).

———. Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment. London: Calder, 1983.

———. The Complete Short Prose, 1929-1989. New York: Grove Press, 1995.

———. The Letters of Samuel Beckett: Volume 1; 1929-1940. Eds. Martha Dow Fehsenfeld and Lois More Overbeck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.

Ben-Zvi, Linda, ed. Women in Beckett: Performance and Critical Perspectives. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1990.

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.

———. Masculine Domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.

Bryden, Mary. Women in Samuel Beckett’s Prose and Drama: Her Own Other. Lanham: Barnes and Noble, 1993.

Butler, Judith. “Imitation and Gender Insubordination”. The Judith Butler Reader. London: Blackwell, 2004 (1990). 119-137.

Carey, John. “Introduction”. The Joke and its Relation to the Unconscious. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 2002. vii-xxviii.

Chisholm, Dianne. “Irigaray’s Hysteria”. Engaging with Irigaray. Eds. Carolyn Burke, Naomi Schor and Margaret Whitford. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994. 263-283.

Crotty, Patrick, ed. Modern Irish Poetry: an Anthology. London: Blackstaff, 1995.

D’Aubarède, Gabriel. “Interview”. Samuel Beckett: the Critical Heritage. Eds. Lawrence Graver and Raymond Federman. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979 (1961). 215-217.

Deane, Seamus. “Imperialism/Nationalism”. Critical Terms for Literary Study. Ed. Frank Lentricchia. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995. 354-368.

Eagleton, Terry and Pierre Bourdieu. “Doxa and the Common Life”. New Left Review 1. 191 (1992): 267-273.

Freud, Sigmund. The Joke and its Relation to the Unconscious. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2002 (1905).

Gibson, Andrew. “Beckett, Vichy, Maurras, and the Body: Premier amour and Nouvelles”. Irish University Review 45. 2 (2015): 281-301.

Heffer, Byron. “Unformed Life in Beckett’s The Unnamable”. Beckett Beyond the Normal. Ed. Seán Kennedy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (forthcoming).

Houston, Lloyd (Maedhbh). “‘Sterilization of the Mind and Apotheosis of the Litter’: Beckett, Censorship and Fertility”. The Review of English Studies 69. 290 (2018): 546-564.

Inglis, Tom. “Religion, Identity, State and Society”. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Irish Culture. Eds. Joe Cleary and Clare Connolly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 59-75.

Kennedy, Seán, “‘A Lingering Dissolution’: All that Fall and Protestant Fears of Engulfment in the Irish Free State”. Assaph: Studies in the Theatre 17/18. Ed. Linda Ben Zvi. (2003): 247-262.

———. “‘Bid us Sigh on from Day to Day’: Beckett and the Irish Big House”. The Edinburgh Companion to Beckett and the Arts. Ed. S.E. Gontarski. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014. 222-236.

Kenner, Hugh. Joyce’s Voices. Dublin: Dalkey Archive Press, 2007.

Kim, Rina. Women and Ireland as Beckett’s Lost Others: Beyond Mourning and Melancholia. London: Palgrave, 2010.

McCormack, W.J. Blood Kindred: W.B. Yeats: the Life, the Death, the Politics. London: Pimlico, 2005.

McMullan, Anna. Theatre on Trial: Samuel Beckett’s Later Drama. London: Routledge, 1993.

McNaughton, James. Samuel Beckett and the Politics of Aftermath. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Nixon, Mark. Samuel Beckett’s German Diaries, 1936-37. London: Continuum, 2011.

Nordau, Max. Degeneration. New York: Appleton, 1895.

Purcell, Siobhán. “Beckett and Disability Politics: The Case of Cuchulain”. Estudios Irlandeses 14.2. Special Issue: Samuel Beckett and Biopolitics. Ed. Seán Kennedy (2019): 52-64.

Siebers, Tobin. Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.

Spelman, Elizabeth. “Woman as Body: Ancient and Contemporary Views”. Feminist Studies 8.1 (1982): 109-131.

Stewart, Paul. Sex and Aesthetics in Samuel Beckett’s Work. London: Palgrave, 2011.

Valente, Joseph. “Aging Yeats: from Fascism to Disability”. Irish Literatures in Transition. Ed. Marjorie Howes and Claire Connolly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).

Publicado

31-10-2019

Cómo citar

Seán Kennedy. (2019). Beckett, Censorship and the Problem of Parody. Estudios Irlandeses, 14(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2019-9186