PREDICTORS OF THE RISK OF ADDICTION TO SOCIAL NETWORKS AND THE INTERNET
Predictores del riesgo de adicción a las redes sociales e Internet


CLEMENTE RODRÍGUEZ-SABIOTE(1), ÁLVARO MANUEL ÚBEDA-SÁNCHEZ(2), CLAUDIA DE BARROS-CAMARGO(3) and DANIEL ÁLVAREZ-FERRÁNDIZ(4)
(1) Universidad de Granada (España)
(2) Universidad de Jaén (España)
(3) Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (España)
(4) Universidad de Granada (España)

DOI: 10.13042/Bordon.2024.99413
Fecha de recepción: 16/04/2023 • Fecha de aceptación: 02/04/2024
Autora de contacto / Corresponding autor: Claudia de Barros-Camargo. E-mail: claudia.barros@edu.uned.es

Cómo citar este artículo: Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Úbeda-Sánchez, Á. M., Barros-Camargo, C. de & Álvarez-Ferrándiz, D. (2024). Predictors of the risk of addiction to social networks and the Internet. Bordón, Revista de Pedagogía, 76(2), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2024.99413


INTRODUCTION. This study was based on the general objective of identifying factors that predict the risk of becoming addicted to the Internet or social networks. METHOD. A descriptive design has been used for the research, using mean, skewness and kurtosis, with a binomial logistic regression. A sample of 217 university students, all of them first year students of the Faculty of Education Sciences of the University of Granada, was used for the research. In this study the demographic variables of age and gender were considered within the investigated students, it is observed that the students had a mean age of 19.37 years and a median of 18 years. In which we can highlight that the majority gender of the sample is female (66.8%) and the remaining 33.2% is male. On the other hand, the Adolescent Risk of Addiction to Social Networks and the Internet (ERA-RSI) scale was used for data collection. RESULTS. The factors that most accurately predict risk of social networking and Internet addiction in first-year college students are normalization, personal difficulties, and ego. Loneliness proved to be predictive, but to a lesser degree, and, finally, disinhibition proved to have no predictive influence. DISCUSSION. It was found that the telephone applications that are constantly launched on the Internet have a great influence on the predictors of addiction.

Keywords: Risk predictors, Addiction, Internet, Social networks, University students.


Introduction

Contemporary society lives immersed in a process of continuous change, in which changes occur at an increasingly greater speed and affect a greater part of the population from different sectors and social stratum. These changes are particularly conditioned by technological advancement and progress, which also impact upon the creation of new digital entertainment settings where individuals, mainly young people, share their time and experiences on a virtual platform. Mobile phone applications (apps), which are constantly being released, social networks and internet, lay the foundations for a generation that lives permanently connected through academic, occupational, social and family activities or through engagement in new leisure practices. However, beyond individual factors, it is important to consider how the sociocultural context shapes the way people access, use and interpret digital technology. Culture provides lenses through which we perceive the world, including technological innovations (Hofstede, 2003Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.). For example, collective norms and values determine whether intensive use of mobile devices is seen as problematic or acceptable. In collectively oriented cultures, such as Asian ones, such use is more likely to be perceived as detrimental to interpersonal relationships (Soto Vega, 2010Soto Vega, E. (2010). Historia de la educación peruana. Derrama Magisterial. ). Likewise, socioeconomic position impacts differential opportunities for access to technology. Studies reveal that young people from disadvantaged contexts face more risks in digital environments (Rodríguez-Sabiote et al., 2020Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Álvarez-Rodríguez, J., Álvarez-Ferrandiz, D. & Zurita-Ortega, F. (2020). Development of Nomophobia Profiles in Education Students through the Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8252.). With all this, to fully understand the challenges posed by ICTs it is essential to attend to the underlying situated meanings and power dynamics shaped by culture and social structure.

Despite the advantages and benefits that new technologies can offer us, it is true that the digital world is not free of risk (Ruiz & Ruiz Domíguez, 2023Ruiz, C. & Ruiz Domínguez, M. A. (2023). Análisis del entorno personal de aprendizaje para la mejora de la competencia digital docente. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 75(3), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2023.97841). A vast array of recent research indicates the large number of internet users who could end up becoming addicts, in the same way that other users have already become addicts to alcohol, drugs or betting. Addiction to social networks and the Internet can cause negative influences among its users and society (Cao et al., 2020Cao, X., Gong, M., Yu, L. & Dai, B. (2020). Exploring the mechanism of social media addiction: An empirical study from WeChat users. Internet Research, 30(4), 1305-1328.). Such addiction has repercussions on the academic and occupational performance, and family life of sufferers (Habib, 2019Habib, M. A. (2019). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Anwer Khan Modern Medical College Journal, 10(2), 103-104. ; Tao et al., 2010Tao, R., Huang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y. & Li, M. (2010). Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction, 105(3), 556-564. doi: 10.1111/j1360-0443.2009.02828.x; Pérez Cabrejos et al., 2021Pérez Cabrejos, R. G., Rodríguez Galán, D. B., Colquepisco Paúcar, N. T. & Enríquez Ludeña, R. L. (2021). Consecuencias de la nomofobia en adolescentes: una revisión sistemática. Conrado, 17(81), 203-210.; Castelló & Ponce, 2020Castelló, E. P. & Ponce, A. C. (2020). Nuevas adicciones: nomofobia o el “¡no sin mi móvil!”. Gaceta Internacional de Ciencias Forenses, 36, 41-45.; Cala & Martínez-Gil, 2022Cala, V. & Martínez Gil, M. del C. (2022). Ciberviolencia en la pareja adolescente: análisis transcultural y de género en centros de secundaria. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 74(2), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2022.91342).

Over recent years, research works have emerged which have analysed the risk factors and consequences associated with excessive use (Andreassen, 2015Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9; Gunay et al., 2018Gunay, O. Öztürk, A., Arslantas, E. & Sevinc, N. (2018). Internet addiction and depression levels in Erciyes University students. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 31(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2018310108; Gundogmus et al., 2020Gundogmus, I., Kul, A. T. & Coban, D. A. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between social network usage and sleep quality among university students/Universite ogrencilerinde sosyal ag kullanimi ve uyku kalitesi arasindaki iliskisinin arastirilmasi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 141-149.; Jeong, 2016Jeong, G. C. (2016). Relationships among mental health, internet addiction, and smartphone addiction in university students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(4), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.04.655; Krishnamurthy & Chetlapalli 2015Krishnamurthy, S. & Chetlapalli, S. K. (2015). Internet addiction: prevalence and risk factors: a cross-sectional study among college students in Bengaluru, the Silicon Valley of India. Indian journal of public health, 59(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.157531; Ozturk et al., 2015Öztürk, C., Bektas, M., Ayar, D., Öztornacı, B. Ö. & Yağcı, D. (2015). Association of personality traits and risk of internet addiction in adolescents. Asian Nursing Research, 9(2), 120-124.; Vaghefi et al., 2020Vaghefi, I., Qahri-Saremi, H. & Turel, O. (2020). Dealing with social networking site addiction: A cognitive-affective model of discontinuance decisions. Internet Research, 30(5), 1427-1453. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0418). As will be demonstrated later on in the present work, a tight relationship also exists between mobile devices or smartphones and the term nomophobia as a clearly emerging risk factor. In the present day, mobile phones have become essential elements that we carry with us at all times due to the fact that they offer quick and easy access to the Internet, social networks, mobile applications, etc. Due to this, nomophobia it thought of as a 21st Century phobia which mostly affects younger populational groups (Bivin et al., 2013Bivin, J. B., Preeti, M., Preveen, C. T. & Jinto, P. (2013). Nomophobia – Do we really need to worry about? Review of Progress, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.709549.v2; Rodríguez-Sabiote et al., 2020Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Álvarez-Rodríguez, J., Álvarez-Ferrandiz, D. & Zurita-Ortega, F. (2020). Development of Nomophobia Profiles in Education Students through the Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8252.). In the sphere of clinical psychology, it is described as the irrational and overwhelming fear of not being able to communicate or be contacted through a mobile device (Yildirim & Correia, 2015Yildirim, C. & Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059; Brand et al., 2023Brand, V. G. & García, L. E. G. (2023). La nomofobia en los adolescentes y el impacto en su salud mental: una revisión sistemática. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC), 15(3), 12-23.; Braña Sánchez et al., 2023Braña Sánchez, Á. J. & María de la Villa, M. J. (2023). Nomofobia y FoMO en el uso del smartphone en jóvenes: el rol de la ansiedad por estar conectado. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 15(3), 12-23.). It serves to highlight some research studies which have been conducted on this topic, for instance those carried out by Gezgin et al., (2016Gezgin, D. M., Cakir, O. & Yildirim, S. (2016). The relationship between levels of nomophobia prevalence and Internet addiction among high school students: the factors influencing nomophobia. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 215-225. https://doi.org/ 10.21890/ijres.383153) and Gezgin et al., (2017Gezgin, D. M., Sahin, Y. L. & Yildirim, S. (2017). The investigation of social network users’ nomophobia levels regarding to various factors. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(1), 11-15.). It may also be useful to draw on studies that uncovered the risks and dangers of digital leisure during childhood and adolescence (Sánchez-Teruel & Robles-Bello, 2016Sánchez-Teruel, D. & Robles-Bello, M. A. (2016). Riesgos y potencialidades de la era digital para la infancia y la adolescencia. Educación y Humanismo, 18(31), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.18.31.1374). It is pertinent, after what has been said, to clarify a bit the term nomophobia, which is described in the field of clinical psychology as the irrational and overwhelming fear of not being able to communicate or be contacted through a mobile device (Yildirim & Correia, 2015Yildirim, C. & Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059). It is considered a 21st century phobia that mainly affects younger population groups (Bivin et al., 2013Bivin, J. B., Preeti, M., Preveen, C. T. & Jinto, P. (2013). Nomophobia – Do we really need to worry about? Review of Progress, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.709549.v2; Rodríguez-Sabiote et al., 2020Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Álvarez-Rodríguez, J., Álvarez-Ferrandiz, D. & Zurita-Ortega, F. (2020). Development of Nomophobia Profiles in Education Students through the Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8252.), and is closely related to the problematic use of smartphones and mobile applications. Some relevant studies are those conducted by Gezgin et al., (2016Gezgin, D. M., Cakir, O. & Yildirim, S. (2016). The relationship between levels of nomophobia prevalence and Internet addiction among high school students: the factors influencing nomophobia. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 215-225. https://doi.org/ 10.21890/ijres.383153) and Gezgin et al., (2017Gezgin, D. M., Sahin, Y. L. & Yildirim, S. (2017). The investigation of social network users’ nomophobia levels regarding to various factors. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(1), 11-15.) exploring the prevalence levels and influence of nomophobia. This could be considered an important risk factor for developing addiction to social networks and the internet, the main topic addressed by this article.

On the other hand, research that has recently explored the relationship between the use of social devices/networks and mental health, especially among young people and adolescents, is scarce; however, we highlight Moreno, López, Romero & Rodríguez (2020Moreno, A. J., López, J., Romero, J. M. & Rodríguez, A.M. (2020). Nomophobia: impact of cell phone use and time to rest among teacher students. Heliyon, 6(5) [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04084] ) who conducted a study with 734 Spanish university students on nomophobia and anxiety. They found that students who showed higher levels of nomophobia also presented more anxiety. Women scored higher on both variables. Ophir, Lipshits-Braziler & Rosenberg, H. (2022) who reviewed studies on the excessive use of social networks and their impact on mental health in adolescents. They conclude that excessive use is related to anxiety, depression, body image problems, among others. They suggest preventive education on the subject. Błachnio, et al. (2021) studied risk and protective factors for well-being in adolescents (14-18 years) during COVID pandemic. Social isolation and low self-esteem increased the risk of problematic social network use. Lee et al. (2020Lee, S. A., Jobe, M. C., Mathis, A. A. & Gibbons, J. A. (2020). Incremental validity of coronaphobia: Coronavirus anxiety explains depression, generalized anxiety, and death anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102268. ) and Lázaro et al. (2021Lázaro, C. et al. (2021). Enfoque comunicativo y cultural de la situación de los profesionales de la salud frente a la pandemia de COVID-19. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 357-380. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1530) conducted a recent systematic review of epidemiological studies on smartphone use and mental health problems. Meta-analysis showed correlation between smartphones and anxiety/depression, but not causal. They suggest longitudinal studies. It is clear, then, that the complexity of the phenomenon of addiction to social networks and the Internet demands a multidisciplinary approach (Kuss & Griffiths, 2017Kuss, D. J. & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311. ). This allows nurturing the analysis from different theoretical and methodological approaches. For example, the field of psychology contributes to the study of psychological and behavioral correlates; psychiatry provides explanatory models of behavioral addiction; education contributes to the design of digital literacy interventions; and sociology examines the sociocultural aspects that mediate the use of technology. This multidisciplinary confluence enriches the comprehensive understanding of a multidimensional object of study. It allows to better capture its complexity, overcoming partial unidisciplinary visions (Montesó-Curto & Aguilar, 2017Montesó-Curto, P. & Aguilar, M. (2017). Transdisciplinarity in Higher Education for Sustainability: How Discourses Are Approached in Engineering Education. Culture and Dialogue, 7(2), 193-215.).

In general, social networks have different addictive components that increase their use, mainly among the younger population. One strategy is the creation of needs such as the Need for Popularity (NFP), which is that everyone wants to be perceived as popular (Utz et al., 2012Utz, S., Tanis, M. & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0651). Thus, introverted people with low self-esteem who are not popular outside social networks such as Facebook, manage to perceive themselves as popular within the social network (Utz et al., 2012Utz, S., Tanis, M. & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0651). Social media addiction can be referred to as social media addiction, and young people are the most addicted sector of the population, accessing social media numerous times a day and for very long periods of time, putting their health at risk (Rodgers et al., 2009Rodgers, R. F., Faure, K. & Chabrol, H. (2009). Gender differences in parental influences on adolescent body dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Sex Roles, 61, 837-849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9690-9; Van den Eijnden et al., 2016Van den Eijnden, R. J., Lemmens, J. S. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). The social media disorder scale. Computers in human behavior, 61, 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038). Studies highlight the significant relationship between the use of social networks and internet addiction (Barat & Sayadi, 2013Barat, N. & Sayadi, S. (2013). Relationship between using social networks and internet addiction and depression among students. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences, 10(5), 332-341.) and how the false attractions of the internet come to cause this addiction and satisfying the psychological and emotional needs of users. Young university students find themselves in an increasingly digital learning and communication environment, which in many cases turn out to be very useful means and tools for their learning in higher education (Gómez-Galán et al., 2020Gómez-Galán, J., Vergara, D., Ordóñez-Olmedo, E. & Veytia-Bucheli, M. G. (2020). Time of use and patterns of Internet consumption in university students: A comparative study between Spanish-speaking countries. Sustainability, 12(12), 5087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125087), but also has negative aspects, mainly in social, leisure and free time contexts (Gómez-Galán et al., 2020Gómez-Galán, J., Vergara, D., Ordóñez-Olmedo, E. & Veytia-Bucheli, M. G. (2020). Time of use and patterns of Internet consumption in university students: A comparative study between Spanish-speaking countries. Sustainability, 12(12), 5087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125087).

In this way, the present work seeks to go beyond simple analysis of the different risks for addiction to the Internet and social networks by identifying the main predictive variables of the behaviours that increase addiction risk in first-year university students. In this way, it strives to contribute a different yet complimentary and practical viewpoint of the scientific literature, coming mainly from the ambits of education, psychology and psychiatry. Considerations are given of a topic that is in a constant state of growth and development, affecting populations which are younger and, often, more vulnerable. Thus, with Andreassen (2015Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9) and Griffiths et al. (2014Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J. & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Social networking addiction: An overview and preliminary findings. En K. P. Rosenberg & L. C. Feder (eds.), Behavioral addictions. Criteria, evidence and treatment (pp. 119-141). Elsevier-Academic Press.), we have chosen the following factors operationalised in five item: normalisation loneliness, ego, disinhibition and personal difficulties. However, we are aware that there are many more factors that may be related to addiction to SNI, especially those related to the personality and lifestyles of the users surveyed. In conclusion, it would be valuable to contrast our findings with studies that address personality and lifestyle factors to identify possible interactions and combined effects on addiction risk.

Study objectives

The following study objectives guided the present research:

  1. Determine the descriptive characteristics of a set of predictive and dependent variables which help to estimate the extent of risk of addiction to social networks and the Internet in first-year university students.
  2. Examine whether statistical differences exist in the recorded incidence of these aforementioned (predictive and dependent) variables as estimated through a dichotomous/binomial response procedure.
  3. Identify the factors that most accurately predict risk behaviours for addiction to social networks and the Internet within the young people described above.

Method

Participants

The present study focuses on first-year university students, a population of special interest given that they are in a stage of transition and identity formation, where peer influence and the need for social belonging play a crucial role (Gallardo-López et al. 2020Gallardo-López, J. A., Pérez-Fuentes, M. D. C., Vallejo, M. D. M., Linares, J. J. G. & Herrera-Peco, I. (2020). Internet Use and Access in University Students: Risk Behaviors for Problematic Use and Its Association with Academic Performance and Emotions. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(9).). Previous research reveals that this age group presents worrying levels of addiction and problematic use of social networks that negatively impact their well-being and academic performance (Selvi et al. 2020Selvi, Y., Özdemir, P. G., Özdemir, M., Boysan, M. & Yıldız, M. (2020). Problematic smartphone use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1-14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11469-019-00204-5; Samaha & Hawi 2016Samaha, M. & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325. ).

Hence, the relevance of studying predictors of social network and internet addiction risk specifically among early college students. This population faces the challenge of adapting to college life, coping with new demands, and forging support networks, factors associated with digital technology abuse (Gomes et al. 2016).

For the present study, a sample of 217 students undertaking the first year of studies in the Faculty of Educational Sciences at the University of Granada was employed. Participants came from a possible total of 425 students who were enrolled on the first year of this course. This sample size represents more than 50% of the reference population and, in all cases, a subject-to-variable ratio (STV) of >5 was obtained or, to be more exact STV=7.75 (217/28). This ratio reflects the coefficient produced after dividing the sample size by the number of items included on the administered scale. Thus, we can confirm that the minimum acceptable sample size to meet out research purposes was achieved (Arrindell & van der Ende, 1985Arrindell, W. A. & van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 165-178.; MacCallum et al., 1999MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.), this being STV>5.

Further, when considering the demographic variables of age and gender within the students under investigation, it is seen that students had an average age of 19.37 years and a median age of 18 years. We prefer the latter of these measures given the presence of a very small number of older students who bias the numerical mean, pushing it upwards. With regards to gender, the majority of the sample is female (66.8%) and the remaining 33.2% is male. This imbalance was corrected during data analysis by stratifying according to gender. Finally, when considering the degree course to which participants belonged, we find that 32.7% were studying a Social Education Degree or Infant Education Degree, 18.9% were undertaking a Primary Education Degree and the remaining 15.7% were enrolled on a Pedagogy Degree. No type of sampling strategy was employed for participant selection. All students undertaking the first year of the aforementioned degrees were informed about the research and invited to fill out the scale online. This online protocol respected the anonymity of students at all times and completion of the scale was entirely voluntary.

Variables

Predictor variables: normalisation, loneliness, ego, disinhibition and personal issues.

Criterion/dependent variables: symptoms of addiction, social use, geek behaviour, nomophobia and overall scale.

Data collection techniques

For data collection, the scale of risk of addiction to social networks and internet for adolescents (SRA-SNI) was used. This scale was designed and validated by Peris et al. (2018Peris, M., Maganto, C. & Garaigordobil, M. (2018). Scale of risk of addiction to social networks and Internet for adolescents: reliability and validity (ERA-RSI). Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 5(2), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2018.05.2.4 , p. 34). It is composed of a total of 29 items, which were reduced to 28 for the present study as item 1 from the personal nature category was eliminated. Items are grouped into 4 factors which were inferred following exploratory factor analysis of outcomes obtained in the original validation study. The first of these factors pertains to symptoms of addiction (items 2 to 8), whose interest lies in determining the place in which and the extent to which students use social networks and the Internet. The second factor is social use (items 9 to 17) which is focused on estimating the way in which students most commonly use social networks and the Internet. The third factor pertains to geek behaviour (items 18 to 23), whose interest lies in outlining the way in which young people invest their time when on social networks and online. Finally, nomophobia (items 24 to 29) is focused on determining the extent of irrational fear experienced when not having a mobile device to hand for a period of time. Responses for questions pertaining to all of these items followed a Likert response format, with scales running from 1 (never/none) to 4 (always/a lot).

In addition, in order to satisfy our research interests, we considered the demographic variables of students’ gender, age and degree course. These variables were not considered as predictors for various reasons. Gender was discarded for the imbalanced sample distribution of males and females. Similarly, degree title was not considered due to the imbalanced sample size available for the various categories. Age was discarded for being excessively homogenous. For this reason, we focused our study on different questions, 5 to be specific, which provided information about 5 considered predictors and produced binomial (no vs yes) data. The choice of these 5 factors occurs because they are the antithesis of the protective factors to avoid addiction to SNI. With Robertson et al. (2018Robertson, T. W., Yan, Z. & Rapoza, K. A. (2018). Is resilience a protective factor of internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 255-260.) and Lei et al. (2018Lei, H., Li, S., Chiu, M. M. & Lu, M. (2018). Social support and Internet addiction among mainland Chinese teenagers and young adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 200-209.) we could highlight resilience, self-control, social support and peer relationships as protective factors.

In congruence with what was explained in the introductory section, we therefore consider the following five predictors:

  1. I regularly have a need to share photographs, write comments, etc. I see it as something normal → normalisation.
  2. Loneliness often pushes me to use social networks and the Internet on electronic devices → loneliness.
  3. I often use social networks and the Internet on electronic devices out of a need to receive recognition from others, for example, by getting a “like” → ego.
  4. I do not think that the regular use of social networks and the Internet on electronic devices carries with it as many risks as people suggest that it does → disinhibition.
  5. I use social networks and the Internet very often on electronic devices because I find it difficult to communicate with others and, generally, I struggle with my social skills → personal difficulties.

Reliability and validity

In order to examine internal consistency of the scale in the present research, we calculated Cronbach’s α y Mc Donald’s ω reliability indices. Outcomes are presented below for individual factors and the overall scale. Internal consistency calculated via Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω indices were .854 and .857, respectively. In both cases, obtained outcomes reveal strong internal consistency of the scale (McDonald, 1999McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Routlegde.; Katz, 2006Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ). With regards to outcomes for Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients according to factors, somewhat lower values were obtained than for the overall scale. The social use factor (.775 and .776 for each of the reliability indices, respectively) most stood out as showing the highest reliability, whilst geek behaviour (.701 and .710, respectively) had the lowest reliability. Despite producing somewhat lower values than those found for the overall scale, these values can also be considered to be moderately acceptable and demonstrate acceptable internal consistency of scale factors (Zumbo et al., 2007Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M. & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/ 10.22237/jmasm/1177992180 ).

With regards to validity, concurrent criterion validity of the items making up the scale was considered. Item-total test correlations were produced which were higher than r>.30, with only some exceptions. However, we ruled out this possibility given that the present sample does not provide a sample size that is 10 times greater than the number of considered variables (10x28=280). Further, neither univariate nor multivariate data met assumptions of normality and kurtosis (Hu & Bentler 1995Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R. H. (ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage. ; Kline 2011Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3.th Ed). The Guilford Press.; Ryu, 2011Ryu, E. (2011). Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1066-1074. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0115-7; Simsek & Noyan, 2012Simsek, G. G. & Noyan, F. (2012). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study. Quality & Quantity, 46(5), 1571-1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9467-4 ). As a result, such calculations were not viable given the sensitivity of fit indices such as the RMSEA index to the failure to meet these requisites Morata-Ramírez et al. (2015Morata-Ramírez, M.ª A., Holgado-Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, I. & Méndez, G. (2015). Análisis factorial confirmatorio: recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-Cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicológica, 12(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.12.1.14362).

Data analysis

In order to meet the stated research objectives, we used the data analysis programs SPSS v.26 (IBM, 2020IBM (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 26) [Computer Software]. IBM Corp.) and Jamovi v.1.2 (The jamovi project, 2020). Diverse statistical techniques were applied which were descriptive, inferential and multivariate in nature. All outcomes were provided stratified according to gender in order to control for imbalances in sample distribution. With regards to descriptive techniques, frequencies and percentages are presented in relation to the response categories of considered variables. Further, binomial tests were employed for inferential statistics and to compare proportions between groups. Finally, for the multivariate analysis we developed various logistic regression models using forward stepwise (Wald) variable entry. These models contemplated five aspects of risk (normalisation, loneliness, ego, disinhibition and personal difficulties) which acted as potential predictors of all of the considered risk factors (symptoms of addiction, social use, geek behaviour, nomophobia and total scale of risk of social network and internet addiction).

Results

Firstly, we show percentages pertaining to each risk predictor stratified according to gender, as well as comparisons between no vs yes levels within each risk predictor.

Figure 1. Percentages corresponding to each of the risk predictors according to female sex and comparison of the yes or no response

Imagen

[View full size] [Descargar tamaño completo]

Figure 2. Percentages pertaining to each risk predictor according to male gender and comparison of the yes or no response

Imagen

[View full size] [Descargar tamaño completo]

As can be seen, within males all predictors show an incredibly strong leaning towards ‘yes’, in the specific case of loneliness, and towards no in the case of all other predictors, namely, ego, disinhibition and personal difficulties. The only exception is seen for the predictor of normalisation, where the distribution of yes and no responses is more balanced, although with responses favouring the yes option by almost 9 percentage points (54.2%−45.8%=8.4%) according with the male gender. With regards to females, highly similar outcomes are produced. It serves to highlight those female students reported feeling more lonely than male students and responded ‘yes’ less frequently with regards to disinhibition.

In fact, in order to confirm this apparent imbalance, we implemented a test to examine whether statistically significant differences existed between the percentage of yes and no responses. This test was conducted in both males and females. The outcomes obtained do not leave any room for doubt. Within both males and females, statistically significant differences were only not produced between the response percentages attributed to yes and no for the predictor of normalisation (p=.556 for males and p= .184 for females), although highly different outcomes were found according to gender. For males, being connected for a long time to social networks or the Internet does not appear to be considered as something normal. In contrast, the proportion reporting this as normal amongst females is higher that the proportion of those stating it not to be normal.

The remaining predictors displayed statistically significant differences between the percentages of respondents in agreement and in disagreement. An identical profile is seen amongst males and females. For the predictors pertaining to ego, disinhibition and personal difficulties, proportions overwhelmingly favour the no response option. On the other hand, the yes response option was reported by a much higher proportion of respondents for the predictor pertaining to loneliness.

Further, in order to assign students to the ‘at risk’ or ‘not at risk’ categories of social network and internet addiction[1], we used the scale conceived by Peris et al. (2018Peris, M., Maganto, C. & Garaigordobil, M. (2018). Scale of risk of addiction to social networks and Internet for adolescents: reliability and validity (ERA-RSI). Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 5(2), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2018.05.2.4 , p. 34). According to this scale, a student, as a function of their gender, can suffer an increased risk of addiction to social networks and the Internet when their scores for the four dimensions and their overall ERA-RIS scale score are greater than or equal to the 3rd quartile (≥Q3). These cut-points are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Cut-points for each factor and overall scale scores according to gender
Factor & Overall scale Symptons addiction Social use Geek behaviour Nomophobia Overall scale
Gender Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
≥Q3 20 23 22 26 11 10 15 16 67 74
Source: Peris et al., 2018. p. 34.

Figure 3. ercentages obtained for each risk type according to female gender and comparison
of no risk vs yes risk

Imagen

[View full size] [Descargar tamaño completo]

Figure 4. Percentages obtained for each risk type according to male gender and comparison of no risk vs yes risk

Imagen

[View full size] [Descargar tamaño completo]

In light of the outcomes obtained, we can appreciate that, both globally and according to gender, ‘not at risk’ percentages predominate for each of the contemplated risk factors. Statistically significant differences (p<.000) were produced for all cases, with the only exception being the risk factor of symptoms of addiction amongst women. In this particular case, although the frequency and proportion to which risk was reported was slightly greater than no risk, statistically significant differences were not produced (p>.05).

Given all of the aforementioned and in response to the main research aim, we developed, as explained above, various binomial logistic regression models using forward stepwise (Wald) entry. The five contemplated aspects of risk acted as potential predictors of the considered risk factors. Before moving on to discuss the obtained outcomes, we checked assumptions of collinearity. For this, the tolerance index was calculated, alongside the variance inflation factor (VIF). Tolerance values close to .9 were obtained for all examined models, whilst VIF values were slightly above 1. If we consider suggestions made by Kleinbaum et al. (1988Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L. & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariables Methods. PWS-KENT Publishing Company.) and Belsley (1991Belsley, D. A. (1991). Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. John Wiley & Sons. ), VIF values <10 and tolerance index values close to one can be interpreted as indicating the absence of collinearity. We can, therefore, conclude that these conditions were met for all of the estimated models.

On the other hand, it is also convenient to clarify the concept Odds ratio (p / 1-p) where:

p = probability of an event occurring

1-p = probability of an event not occurring

From this odds ratio the probability of an event can be derived:

pro{ yes } = e Bo+B1X / 1 + e Bo+B1X or pro{ yes } = 1 / 1 + e Bo+B1X.

where:

Bo and B1 are the coefficients estimated from the data.

“X” would be the independent variable

“e” is the natural logarithm base (2.718).

In our case, as we have several independent variables, the model would be as follows:

pro{ yes } = 1 / 1 + e-z

where: Z is the linear combination:

Z = Bo + B1X1 + B2X2 + BnXn

And where:

Bo is the constant or intercept and expresses the value of the probability of Z when the independent variables are zero.

B1, B2, Bn are slope coefficients and report how much the probability of occurrence of Z varies with a unit change of the corresponding independent variable, keeping the other explanatory variables constant X1 and X2 values that the independent variables can adopt e represents the disturbance term or the estimation error. Here is the explanatory table with the provided information (Table 2):

Table 2. Explanatory of concept Odds ratio
Concept Formula Description
Odds ratio p / (1-p) p = probability of an event occurring
1-p = probability of an event not occurring
Probability of an event (single independent variable) pro{ yes } = e^(Bo+B1X) / (1 + e^(Bo+B1X))
or
pro{ yes } = 1 / (1 + e^(Bo+B1X))
Bo and B1 are the coefficients estimated from the data
“X” is the independent variable
“e” is the natural logarithm base (2.718)
Probability of an event (multiple independent variables) pro{ yes } = 1 / (1 + e^-z) Z is the linear combination:
Z = Bo + B1X1 + B2X2 + ... + BnXn
Bo is the constant or intercept and expresses the value of the probability of Z when the independent variables are zero
B1, B2, ..., Bn are slope coefficients and report how much the probability of occurrence of Z varies with a unit change of the corresponding independent variable, keeping the other explanatory variables constant
X1 and X2 are values that the independent variables can adopt
ε represents the disturbance term or the estimation error

This table summarizes the key concepts and formulas related to odds ratios and the probability of an event occurring in the context of logistic regression with single and multiple independent variables.

Since we considered differentiated scales for males and females with regards to the obtained outcomes, different elaborated models are presented which break down outcomes according to gender (Table 3).

Tabla 3. Binomial logistic regression models for males
MODEL 1: Symptoms addiction B S.E. Wald df Sig. SSHLT PPPC
Predictors Normalisation 1.34 .60 5.03 1 .025* .0507 76.4%
Loneliness 2.56 1.07 5.65 1 .017*
Constant -3.69 1.09 11.41 1 .000**
MODEL 2: Social use B S.E. Wald df Sig. SSHLT PPPC
Predictors No predictor has been statistically significant
MODEL 3: Geek behaviour B S.E. Wald df Sig. SSHLT PPPC
Predictors No predictor has been statistically significant
MODEL 4: Nomophobia B S.E. Wald df Sig. SSHLT PPPC
Predictors Ego 1.645 .899 3.348 1 .047* .875 90.7%
Personal_Difficulties 1.775 .903 3.869 1 .049*
Constant -3.125 .652 22.964 1 .000***
MODEL 5: Overall scale B S.E. Wald df Sig. SSHLT PPPC
Predictors Personal_Difficulties 1.981 .899 4.851 1 .028* .988 91.7%
Constant -2.962 .592 25.023 1 .000***
*p<.05**p<.01***p<.001
SSHLT→ Statistical significance of Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
PPPC→ Percentage of properly predicted cases

As appears to emerge from observation of the table presented immediately before discussion of the five criterion or dependent variables considered in the present study, effective predictors of risk associated with social network and internet addiction could only be inferred from three of these variables.

Firstly, with regards to model 1 pertaining to symptoms of addiction, we found an intercept, or constant, of β0 =-3.69 (p<.001), in addition to two predictors with slopes of β1= 2.56 (loneliness) and β2=1.34 (normalisation). Both of these were associated with statistically significant Wald statistics (p=.017 and p=.025, respectively) and, for this reason, they were included in the model as effective predictors. Secondly, with regards to models 2 and 3 pertaining to social use and geek behaviour, not a single effective predictor was found. Statistically significant predictors were again produced in model 4 pertaining to the risk factor relating to nomophobia, with this model obtaining an intercept of β0 =-3.12 (p<.001) and two predictors with slopes of β1= 1.77 (personal difficulties) and β2=1.64 (ego). In both of these cases, statistically significant Wald statistics (p=.049 and p=.047, respectively) were also seen to emerge. Finally, in model 5 pertaining to the overall scale, an intercept of β0 =-2.96 (p<.001) and a single predictor with a slope of β1= 1.98 (personal difficulties) were observed. This slope was associated with a statistically significant Wald statistic (p=.028). In all cases, it can be seen that the estimated coefficients relating to the slopes were positive. This means that the logistic function established between the predictor and its criterion reveals a direct relationship in that, when students report the response option 0 (no), they also have a greater chance of obtaining a value of 0 (no risk of the criterion factor) for the predictor and vice versa.

With regards to model fit of the resultant models, we conducted the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Statistical significance (p>.05) was obtained for three of the inferred models of effective predictors. This indicates good fit given that there are no statistically significant differences between the predicted models and the actual data. Finally, with regards to the predictive strength of these three models, we can see that the percentage of correctly predicted cases was 76.4% in model 1, 90.7% in model 4 and 91.7% in model 5. This gives an average 86.26% correct prediction rate.

Finally, in order to give an overall view of obtained outcomes in relation to the examined predictors, we present the following summary Table 4.

Tabla 4.Summary table of predictors and criteria variables (factors)
Gender Factors Predictors Number of predictors
Normalisation Loneliness Ego Disinhibition Personal difficulties
Male Symptoms of addiction Yes predictor Yes predictor 2
Social use 0
Geek behaviour 0
Nomophobia Yes predictor Yes predictor 2
Overall scale Yes predictor 1
Female Symptoms of addiction Yes predictor Yes predictor 2
Social use Yes predictor Yes predictor Yes predictor Yes predictor 4
Geek behaviour Yes predictor 1
Nomophobia Yes predictor Yes predictor 2
Overall scale Yes predictor Yes predictor 2
Number of times the predictor appears in various equations for males 1 1 1 0 2 16
Number of times the predictor appears in various equations for females 4 1 3 0 3

In consideration of the table presented above, two types of analysis can be approached. Vertical analysis (for predictors) is one type of analysis, whist horizontal analysis (for criterion variables) is another. Vertical analysis (of predictors such as normalisation) pertains to one model for males and four models for females. Further, personal difficulties (member of 2 models for males and 3 for females) and ego (forming part of 1 model for males and 3 models for females) emerged as the most important predictors of the risk of social network and internet addiction in the sample of first-year university students under study. Far lower importance was attributed to the predictor of loneliness (member of 1 model for males and 1 model for females). Further mention should also be given to the outcomes obtained for the predictor describing disinhibition given that its contribution to predicting the risk of addiction to social networks and the Internet was totally null.

With regards to factors or dimensions of the scale as a whole (horizontal analysis), we can observe that, in the case of males, both symptoms of addiction and nomophobia can be predicted from indices of normalisation and loneliness. This was clearly revealed through binary logistic regression outcomes. Further, overall risk can be predicted from only one predictor, this being that of personal difficulties.

With regards to females, a greater number of predictors emerged. In this way, we can see that two predictors (normalisation and ego) were produced in relation to the factor describing symptoms of addiction and the overall scale which can help inform predictions of lower or higher incidence. For nomophobia, the predictors of normalisation and personal difficulties emerged, whilst, only personal difficulties emerged as a predictor of geek behaviours. Nonetheless, the factor to reveal the most complexity is undoubtedly that of social use. Higher and lower levels of incidence of this factor is predicted by 4 predictors, namely, normalisation, loneliness, ego and personal difficulties.

Discussion and conclusions

A series of conclusions can be reached given the results presented here. Firstly, with regards to the merely descriptive and inferential outcomes, we can differentiate between predictors and the factors which serve to predict these aforementioned predictors.

With regards to incidence of the 5 predictors when considered according to gender, we observe that this incidence was generally similar across predictors. In this way, we can see that, for both males and females, the predominant category for the predictor describing normalisation was not considering constant social network and internet use as normal. Nevertheless, the ‘yes’ category garnered enough responses for statistically significant differences to not be produced. With regards to the predictor describing loneliness, both males and females stated feeling lonely enough to have to focus their interests on social networks and the Internet in such a way that the ‘yes’ category was opted for significantly more than the ‘no’ category.

Finally, for the predictors describing ego, disinhibition and personal difficulties, the ‘no’ category predominated significantly relative to the ‘yes’ category. Thus, we can conclude that both males and females mostly state that they do not feel the need for recognition from others when they use social networks and the Internet as a substitute for more tangible recognition. Further, they appear to be aware of the limits and dangers involved in social network and internet use, whilst also not suffering from personal difficulties related with a lack of empathy, personal communication issues or social skills, making them focus themselves on social networks and the Internet.

With regards to incidence of the 5 factors considered as criterion variables, we can conclude that, for both males and females, risk of addiction to social networks and the Internet does not appear to be particularly high. In this sense, the likelihood of not being at risk (‘no’) was greater than the likelihood of being at risk (‘yes’), with statistically significant differences emerging in all cases. The only exception to this is seen for symptoms of addiction within females, although the ‘not at risk’ category still had more responses.

Nonetheless, as previously explained and in order to definitively establish another essential aspect of the present study, we strove to identify the predictors that were most accurately able to predict the risk of first-year university students suffering social network and internet addiction. In relation to this proposal, we can observe that the predictors that most help in predicting the risk of suffering an addiction to social networks and the Internet are the consideration of this type of addiction as something normal, suffering personal difficulties and having a high consideration of oneself (ego). Loneliness emerged to a lesser extent within the studied sample. However, other research studies did find loneliness to be an important component when considering social network and internet addiction (Moser, 2000Moser, I. (2000). Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as Culture, 9(2), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695234), whilst also acting as a determinant of the way in which individuals interact with the digital world (Nowland et al., 2018Nowland, R., Necka, E. A. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2018). Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 13(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052). Disinhibition or the tendency to minimise the dangers of social network and internet use had a null influence. With regards to considering internet and social network addiction as something normal, it feels like a risky practice and one that is at odds to that which is commonly established as safe, responsible and controlled use of new technology. This social conception of the normalisation of internet and social network addiction could truly be related with what the literature upholds as future normalisation of addiction to specific substances (Keane, 2020Keane, H. (2020). A normalised future of addiction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102972). Along the same lines, it has been more than demonstrated by a number of studies that this belief is not correct given that such addiction can translate to psychological issues (depression, anxiety, dependence, etc.), school failure, and family, personal and occupational issues (Akin & Iskender, 2011Akin, A. & Iskender, M. (2011). Internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress. International online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 138-148.; Lozano et al., 2020Lozano Blasco, R. et al. (2020). Social network addiction and its impact on anxiety level among university students. Sustainability, 12(13), 5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135397). Such evidence serves to highlight the importance of the dangers of excessive social network or internet use as, in young people, such issues can lead to the breaking of affective ties and, as a result, social problems (Hernández Contreras et al., 2019Contreras, J. H., Martínez, M. O., Almaguer, J. M., Ramírez, A. & Miramontes, A. (2019). Adicción a Internet: el caso de adolescentes de cinco escuelas secundarias de México. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología Nueva Época, 34-45.).

Finally, a relationship was established between some of the warning signs proposed by Young (1998) and Griffiths (2000Griffiths, M. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 211-218.). In this way, addiction to the Internet, social networks or new technological devices could be revealed by some of the predictor variables proposed in the present study. These include: denying oneself sleep time in order to stay online; losing the notion of time when connected (disinhibition); complaints and family conflict due to excessive internet use; uncontrolled excitement and euphoria when using the Internet, social networks or technological devices; lying about the time one is connected to the Internet or using social networks, and; social isolation (loneliness).

After discussing the findings of this study and trying to establish a general conclusion with implications for education, we can focus on the most important predictors such as normalisation, personal difficulties and ego. Although we could also include loneliness in view of the results of other studies that address the issue of addiction to social networks and which have been mentioned earlier in this section. Moreover, in light of the latest news and information about the great escalation in the use of artificial intelligence with specific applications such as ChatGPT, this may pose a new challenge for research and the specific impact this may have on the academic world. The results of this research can provide us with information about certain behaviours, attitudes and expressions that our university students may engage in and alert us to potential symptoms of excessive use and/or addiction to social networks. In order to prevent certain addictions before they become a real problem, interventions and programmes can be designed based on the results of this and other similar studies to address the dangers of addiction to social networks and the Internet from a multitude of mobile and digital devices. Awareness of this from the early years of university in an increasingly technological environment can be of great benefit to the optimal social, psychological and academic development of university students.

Study limitations and future perspectives

The present study has some limitations which are mainly methodological in nature. In this regard, the first limitation is that the study was carried out within a single university context (a single faculty). Another limitation was the inclusion of more females than males, although this limitation was minimised by developing separate analyses according to gender with the aim of ensuring invariance in the groups. Another notable limitation is the absence of a larger sample that represents in a more balanced way the rest of the courses, grades and degrees of the higher education institution under study.

With regards to future perspectives of the present work, we should highlight the contribution of identifying the aspects that may influence addiction to a greater or lesser extent, alongside the urge to impact these factors through training, education, psychology, etc. (Sanz Benito et al., 2023Sanz Benito, I., Lázaro Cantabrana, J. L. & Grimalt Álvaro, C. (2023). La inclusión digital en la formación inicial del profesorado: una revisión sistemática. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 75(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2023.94541). It is recommended that such actions take place at the earliest age possible given that the youngest of our society have early access to the digital world. Given this, research such as that conducted by Prats et al. (2018Prats, M. A., Torres-Rodríguez, A., Oberst, U. & Carbonell, X. (2018). Diseño y aplicación de talleres educativos para el uso saludable de internet y redes sociales en la adolescencia: descripción de un estudio piloto. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 52, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i52.08) is hugely important. This research presents educational workshops as a form of pedagogical guidance for adolescents. These workshops address good social network and internet use, and could undoubtedly be of great use when it comes to raising awareness amongst young people about engaging in a more ethical, critical and responsible use of technology. Further, the huge opportunities offered by new virtual settings, accessed through different digital devices, cannot be ignored with regards to the generation of knowledge and awareness (Salmerón et al., 2010Salmerón, H., Fernández, S. R. & Braojos, C. G. (2010). Metodologías que optimizan la comunicación en entornos de aprendizaje virtual. Comunicar, 34(17), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.3916/C34-2010-03-16). They are also of great pedagogical value and opportunities to take advantage of technological resources and social networks should not be missed in order to be able to work from different ambits of higher education (Fernández-Ferrer & Cano, 2016Fernández-Ferrer, M. & Cano, E. (2016). The influence of the internet for pedagogical innovation: using twitter to promote online collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(22), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0021-2; Lu et al., 2021Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y. & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-13.; Peña Hita et al., 2018Peña Hita, M. D. L. Á., Rueda López, E. & Pegalajar Palomino, M. D. C. (2018). Posibilidades didácticas de las redes sociales en el desarrollo de competencias de educación superior: Percepciones del alumnado. Píxel-Bit Revista de Medios y Educación, 53, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.16).

In conclusion, perhaps the most practical and useful aspect of the present work, in consideration of its nature and the viability of translating it into educational practice, is that it provides the opportunity to work with young people and impact upon predictive variables of internet and social network addiction. The work is timely as it permits these variables to be influenced before they become an issue demanding a more complex solution. In other words, working with such variables could prevent specific addictions. In the present case, the most important predictors to be identified in the prediction of risk of internet and social network addiction were normalisation, personal difficulties and ego. But we should not forget that future consideration of new work should also include factors related to the personality and lifestyles of the users surveyed.

Compliance with Ethical Standard

In this research and its corresponding work, the ethical guidelines that cover all studies of this nature have been taken into account. The corresponding ethical authorization, issued by the University of Granada, has been obtained.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Treatment of Research

The development of this research follows the ethical criteria endorsed by the Code Of Good Practice in Research of the University of Granada (https://www.ugr.es/node/13648). In this regard, the University of Granada firmly adheres to UNESCO’s Declaration on Science (http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/eng/declaration_e.htm) and the Use of Scientific Knowledge, and the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (https://wcrif.org/guidance/singapore-statement). Therefore, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of honesty, rigour, conflicts of interest and research misconduct and unacceptable practices. All the participants of this research have completed an Informed Consent Form.

Notes

[1] From now on referred to as SNI.

References

Akin, A. & Iskender, M. (2011). Internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress. International online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 138-148.
Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
Arrindell, W. A. & van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 165-178.
Barat, N. & Sayadi, S. (2013). Relationship between using social networks and internet addiction and depression among students. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences, 10(5), 332-341.
Belsley, D. A. (1991). Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. John Wiley & Sons.
Bivin, J. B., Preeti, M., Preveen, C. T. & Jinto, P. (2013). Nomophobia – Do we really need to worry about? Review of Progress, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.709549.v2
Brand, V. G. & García, L. E. G. (2023). La nomofobia en los adolescentes y el impacto en su salud mental: una revisión sistemática. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC)15(3), 12-23.
Braña Sánchez, Á. J. & María de la Villa, M. J. (2023). Nomofobia y FoMO en el uso del smartphone en jóvenes: el rol de la ansiedad por estar conectado. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 15(3), 12-23.
Cala, V. & Martínez Gil, M. del C. (2022). Ciberviolencia en la pareja adolescente: análisis transcultural y de género en centros de secundaria. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 74(2), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2022.91342
Cao, X., Gong, M., Yu, L. & Dai, B. (2020). Exploring the mechanism of social media addiction: An empirical study from WeChat users. Internet Research30(4), 1305-1328.
Castelló, E. P. & Ponce, A. C. (2020). Nuevas adicciones: nomofobia o el “¡no sin mi móvil!”. Gaceta Internacional de Ciencias Forenses, 36, 41-45.
Contreras, J. H., Martínez, M. O., Almaguer, J. M., Ramírez, A. & Miramontes, A. (2019). Adicción a Internet: el caso de adolescentes de cinco escuelas secundarias de México. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología Nueva Época, 34-45.
Fernández-Ferrer, M. & Cano, E. (2016). The influence of the internet for pedagogical innovation: using twitter to promote online collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(22), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0021-2
Gallardo-López, J. A., Pérez-Fuentes, M. D. C., Vallejo, M. D. M., Linares, J. J. G. & Herrera-Peco, I. (2020). Internet Use and Access in University Students: Risk Behaviors for Problematic Use and Its Association with Academic Performance and Emotions. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(9).
Gezgin, D. M., Cakir, O. & Yildirim, S. (2016). The relationship between levels of nomophobia prevalence and Internet addiction among high school students: the factors influencing nomophobia. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 215-225. https://doi.org/ 10.21890/ijres.383153
Gezgin, D. M., Sahin, Y. L. & Yildirim, S. (2017). The investigation of social network users’ nomophobia levels regarding to various factors. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(1), 11-15.
Gómez-Galán, J. (2020). Media education in the ICT era: Theoretical structure for innovative teaching styles. Information, 11(5), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11050276
Gómez-Galán, J., Vergara, D., Ordóñez-Olmedo, E. & Veytia-Bucheli, M. G. (2020). Time of use and patterns of Internet consumption in university students: A comparative study between Spanish-speaking countries. Sustainability, 12(12), 5087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125087
Griffiths, M. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 211-218.
Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J. & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Social networking addiction: An overview and preliminary findings. En K. P. Rosenberg & L. C. Feder (eds.), Behavioral addictions. Criteria, evidence and treatment (pp. 119-141). Elsevier-Academic Press.
Gunay, O. Öztürk, A., Arslantas, E. & Sevinc, N. (2018). Internet addiction and depression levels in Erciyes University students. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 31(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2018310108
Gundogmus, I., Kul, A. T. & Coban, D. A. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between social network usage and sleep quality among university students/Universite ogrencilerinde sosyal ag kullanimi ve uyku kalitesi arasindaki iliskisinin arastirilmasi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 141-149.
Habib, M. A. (2019). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Anwer Khan Modern Medical College Journal, 10(2), 103-104.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R. H. (ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage.
IBM (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 26) [Computer Software]. IBM Corp.
Jeong, G. C. (2016). Relationships among mental health, internet addiction, and smartphone addiction in university students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(4), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.04.655
Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Keane, H. (2020). A normalised future of addiction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102972
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L. & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariables Methods. PWS-KENT Publishing Company.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3.th Ed). The Guilford Press.
Krishnamurthy, S. & Chetlapalli, S. K. (2015). Internet addiction: prevalence and risk factors: a cross-sectional study among college students in Bengaluru, the Silicon Valley of India. Indian journal of public health, 59(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.157531
Kuss, D. J. & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311.
Lázaro, C. et al. (2021). Enfoque comunicativo y cultural de la situación de los profesionales de la salud frente a la pandemia de COVID-19. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 357-380. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1530
Lee, S. A., Jobe, M. C., Mathis, A. A. & Gibbons, J. A. (2020). Incremental validity of coronaphobia: Coronavirus anxiety explains depression, generalized anxiety, and death anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102268.
Lei, H., Li, S., Chiu, M. M. & Lu, M. (2018). Social support and Internet addiction among mainland Chinese teenagers and young adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior85, 200-209.
Lozano Blasco, R. et al. (2020). Social network addiction and its impact on anxiety level among university students. Sustainability12(13), 5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135397
Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y. & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education18, 1-13.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Routlegde.
Montesó-Curto, P. & Aguilar, M. (2017). Transdisciplinarity in Higher Education for Sustainability: How Discourses Are Approached in Engineering Education. Culture and Dialogue, 7(2), 193-215.
Morata-Ramírez, M.ª A., Holgado-Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, I. & Méndez, G. (2015). Análisis factorial confirmatorio: recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-Cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicológica, 12(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.12.1.14362
Moreno, A. J., López, J., Romero, J. M. & Rodríguez, A.M. (2020). Nomophobia: impact of cell phone use and time to rest among teacher students. Heliyon, 6(5) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04084
Moser, I. (2000). Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as Culture, 9(2), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695234
Nowland, R., Necka, E. A. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2018). Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 13(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052
Öztürk, C., Bektas, M., Ayar, D., Öztornacı, B. Ö. & Yağcı, D. (2015). Association of personality traits and risk of internet addiction in adolescents. Asian Nursing Research9(2), 120-124.
Peña Hita, M. D. L. Á., Rueda López, E. & Pegalajar Palomino, M. D. C. (2018). Posibilidades didácticas de las redes sociales en el desarrollo de competencias de educación superior: Percepciones del alumnado. Píxel-Bit Revista de Medios y Educación, 53, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.16
Pérez Cabrejos, R. G., Rodríguez Galán, D. B., Colquepisco Paúcar, N. T. & Enríquez Ludeña, R. L. (2021). Consecuencias de la nomofobia en adolescentes: una revisión sistemática. Conrado17(81), 203-210.
Peris, M., Maganto, C. & Garaigordobil, M. (2018). Scale of risk of addiction to social networks and Internet for adolescents: reliability and validity (ERA-RSI). Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes5(2), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2018.05.2.4 
Prats, M. A., Torres-Rodríguez, A., Oberst, U. & Carbonell, X. (2018). Diseño y aplicación de talleres educativos para el uso saludable de internet y redes sociales en la adolescencia: descripción de un estudio piloto. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 52, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i52.08
Robertson, T. W., Yan, Z. & Rapoza, K. A. (2018). Is resilience a protective factor of internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior78, 255-260.
Rodgers, R. F., Faure, K. & Chabrol, H. (2009). Gender differences in parental influences on adolescent body dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Sex Roles, 61, 837-849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9690-9
Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Álvarez-Rodríguez, J., Álvarez-Ferrandiz, D. & Zurita-Ortega, F. (2020). Development of Nomophobia Profiles in Education Students through the Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(21), 8252.
Ruiz, C. & Ruiz Domínguez, M. A. (2023). Análisis del entorno personal de aprendizaje para la mejora de la competencia digital docente. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 75(3), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2023.97841
Ryu, E. (2011). Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1066-1074. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0115-7
Salmerón, H., Fernández, S. R. & Braojos, C. G. (2010). Metodologías que optimizan la comunicación en entornos de aprendizaje virtual. Comunicar, 34(17), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.3916/C34-2010-03-16
Samaha, M. & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325.
Sánchez-Teruel, D. & Robles-Bello, M. A. (2016). Riesgos y potencialidades de la era digital para la infancia y la adolescencia. Educación y Humanismo, 18(31), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.18.31.1374
Sanz Benito, I., Lázaro Cantabrana, J. L. & Grimalt Álvaro, C. (2023). La inclusión digital en la formación inicial del profesorado: una revisión sistemática. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 75(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2023.94541
Selvi, Y., Özdemir, P. G., Özdemir, M., Boysan, M. & Yıldız, M. (2020). Problematic smartphone use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1-14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11469-019-00204-5
Simsek, G. G. & Noyan, F. (2012). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study. Quality & Quantity, 46(5), 1571-1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9467-4
Soto Vega, E. (2010). Historia de la educación peruana. Derrama Magisterial. 
Tao, R., Huang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y. & Li, M. (2010). Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction, 105(3), 556-564. doi: 10.1111/j1360-0443.2009.02828.x
Utz, S., Tanis, M. & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0651
Vaghefi, I., Qahri-Saremi, H. & Turel, O. (2020). Dealing with social networking site addiction: A cognitive-affective model of discontinuance decisions. Internet Research30(5), 1427-1453. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0418
Van den Eijnden, R. J., Lemmens, J. S. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). The social media disorder scale. Computers in human behavior, 61, 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038
Yildirim, C. & Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059
Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M. & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/ 10.22237/jmasm/1177992180

Resumen

Predictores del riesgo de adicción a las redes sociales e Internet

INTRODUCCIÓN. Este estudio se ha basado en el objetivo general de identificar los factores que predicen el riesgo de convertirse en adicto a Internet o a las redes sociales. MÉTODO. Para la investigación se ha utilizado un diseño descriptivo, utilizando la media, asimetría y curtosis, con una regresión binomial logística. Para la investigación se utilizó una muestra de 217 estudiantes universitarios, todos ellos de primer curso de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Granada. En este estudio se consideraron las variables demográficas de edad y género dentro de los estudiantes investigados, se observa que los estudiantes tenían una edad media de 19.37 años y una mediana de 18 años. En el cual, podemos destacar que el género mayoritario de la muestra es el femenino con un (66.8%) y el 33.2% restante es masculino. Por otro lado, para la recogida de datos se utilizó la escala de riesgo de adicción a las redes sociales e internet para adolescentes (ERA-RSI). RESULTADOS. Los factores que predicen con mayor precisión el riesgo de adicción a las redes sociales y a Internet en los estudiantes universitarios de primer año son la normalización, las dificultades personales y el ego. La soledad resultó ser predictiva, pero en menor grado, y, por último, la desinhibición resultó no tener influencia predictiva. DISCUSIÓN. Se ha comprobado que las aplicaciones telefónicas que se lanzan constantemente en Internet tienen una gran influencia en los predictores de la adicción.

Palabras clave: Predictores de riesgo, Adicción, Internet, Redes sociales, Estudiantes universitarios.


Résumé

Prédicteurs du risque d’addiction aux réseaux sociaux et à Internet

INTRODUCTION. Cette étude a pour objectif général d’identifier les facteurs prédictifs du risque de dépendance à Internet ou aux réseaux sociaux. MÉTHODE. Un modèle descriptif a été utilisé pour la recherche en utilisant la moyenne, l’asymétrie et l’aplatissement, avec une régression logistique binomiale. Un échantillon de 217 étudiants universitaires, tous en première année de Sciences de l’Education à l’Université de Grenade, a été utilisé pour la recherche. Dans cette étude, les variables démographiques de l’âge et du sexe ont été prises en compte chezles étudiants étudiés. Il a été observé que les étudiants avaient un âge moyen de 19,37 ans avecune médiane de 18 ans. En outre, nous pouvons souligner que la majorité de l’échantillon est composée d’un 66,8 % de femmes et que les 33,2% restants sont des hommes. Pour la collecte des données, l’échelle ERA-RSI (Adolescent Risk of Addiction to Social Networks and the Internet) a été utilisée. RÉSULTATS. Les facteurs qui prédisent le risque d’addiction aux réseaux sociaux et à Internet chez les étudiants universitaires de première année sont la normalisation, les difficultés personnelles et l’ego. La solitude s’est avérée prédictive, mais à un degré moins important et, enfin, la désinhibition n’a pas eu d’influence prédictive. DISCUSSION. Il a été constaté que les applications téléphoniques constamment lancées sur internet ont une forte influence sur les prédicteurs de la dépendance.

Mots-clés : Prédicteurs de risque, Dépendance, Internet, Réseaux sociaux, Étudiants universitaires.


Perfil profesional de los autores

Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote

Profesor titular del Departamento de MIDE de la Universidad de Granada. Autor de numerosos trabajos científicos publicados en revistas de impacto y miembro de diversos proyectos de investigación I+D+I.

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3094-9199

Correo electrónico de contacto: clerosa@ugr.es

Álvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez

Profesor ayudante doctor del Departamento de Pedagogía de la Universidad de Jaén. Ha publicado varios artículos científicos en revistas de impacto y Congresos Internacionales de prestigio.

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-8767

Correo electrónico de contacto: aubeda@ujaen.es

Claudia de Barros-Camargo

Profesora ayudante doctor del Departamento de MIDE-I (UNED, Madrid). Participación destacada en múltiples proyectos de investigación, publicaciones de impacto, así como dirección de congresos internacionales y nacionales. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-8674

Dirección para la correspondencia: Facultad de Educación. Calle Juan del Rosal, 14. 28040 Madrid (España).

Correo electrónico de contacto: claudia.barros@edu.uned.es

Daniel Álvarez-Ferrándiz

Profesor sustituto interino del Departamento de DOE de la Universidad de Granada. Acredita la autoría de diversos artículos científicos y trabajos presentados a diferentes Congresos Internacionales y nacionales.

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-1334

Correo electrónico de contacto: dalferrandiz@ugr.es